changing, chris. the original idea was this would save money. then underperforming schools. so it get all muddled. the real issue is that it doesn t save money. that s what is so unfortunate about this. it won t save the money they claim it will. and when it does start to save money, the earliest will be in throw years. so you re head of the teacher s union. he said of course the each teach are s union doesn t want the mayor to close schools. they want the jobs. is that what why you are doing this? first of all, when the student move from one school to another, by and large teacher follow the students. that part of the bargaining collective agreement. but what it is about is that we will have a quality offed education severely compromise.