let s see all the records not just the handpicked group from elon musk. harris: i heard you drop the trump word. you are right christopher wray was there. who is leading the f.b.i. now? christopher wray. harris: he is biden s guys now. if there were so many problems why didn t he get rid of him? now we get to dig in with republicans in charge of the house. what do you think we ll find out, matt? the journalist on this file says influence campaign by the feds. that s more than frightening. it is. i will say this broadly. law enforcement deserves admiration and respect and they re heroes. what i m saying about to say i don t mean about the people on the front lines. i don t understand the people who sit behind the desk in ill fitting khakis and retweet all day. i do that and don t get a taxpayer salary and pension.
and puts out these statements, the other day it was the president who directed staff to put out the first statement he wanted to respond to this book. they put out another one today about the interviews this morning. this is bothering the president. he doesn t like it. and the statements make sense. it does reflect on omarosa s character to be doing this. but the question always comes next. why was she there? why was she given this position? why was she given $180,000 taxpayer salary? i think we know what the answer is. the answer is there were not a lot of minorities who were willing to go you took our answer, tokenism. it s hard to say when you re a reporter reporting on this white house, but there are not there s nobody else in there. kellyanne conway got a question this morning, who is the next highest ranking black official in the white house? she s pretty good in these interviews at vamping and she was stumped. so let me clarify the record
when the white house comes out and puts out these statements, the other day it was the president who directed staff to put out the first statement he wanted to respond to this book. they put out another one today about the interviews this morning. this is bothering the president. he doesn t like it. and the statements make sense. it does reflect on omarosa s character to be doing this. but the question always comes next. why was she there? why was she given this position? why was she given $180,000 taxpayer salary? i think we know what the answer is. the answer is there were not a lot of minorities who were willing to go you took our answer, tokenism. it s hard to say when you re a reporter reporting on this white house, but there are not there s nobody else in there. kellyanne conway got a question this morning, who is the next highest ranking black official in the white house? she s pretty good in these interviews at vamping and she was stumped. so let me clarify the record
supremacist merred someone. it s a tipping point for this white house, but when you have somebody who led a birther campaign for five years, when you have someone who busy said so many offensive things and i m talking about donald trump, not steve bannon, he did those things without steve bannon being in the room. steve bannon wasn t there for the press conference. this white house doesn t fundamentally change even though bannon is no longer in it. to the point, bannon s departure being a victory for the democrats. i think it s a good think. you don t have a devout white nationalist in the white house getting taxpayer salary but i still think there s a number of positive siz that this administration is putting forward through the attorney general and other areas particularly immigration where you still have the same problem. you still have people families being split up and people being deported. there s a number of different policy issues that this administration is really putting
florist asked to serve a gay wedding. think when you re a government employee you re put in a different position. joining us, adam wolfson the founder and president of freedom to marry, an organization going out of business because of the supreme court ruling. yes. we achieved what we set out to do. senator paul was the one talking about i think there should be some room for people to exercise their religious believes and not be told they have to do something they find morally objectionable. on one hand, i get that. do elected officials have the right to exercise the religious freedom that s opposite to the law they re elected to carry out? this is not a question of religious freedom. no one is telling her what to believe, what to think, what to do. she took an oath to do a job, she draws an $80,000 taxpayer salary. if she doesn t feel she can do