to me, that s harrowing, without regard to her being married to a justice, that she is more harrowing into respects. one, she could be trading off that relationship for the influence she has. and number two, it has not proven, but if they are birds of a feather in the kind of relationship they ve always had, if in any way the justice of the supreme court entertains these views, and has to hear cases, that s head spinning. asawin, you say these interactions have taken on u.s. significance since the january six committee released text messages between meadows and jimmy. how so? well, it s because the tax wish she interacted with trump, when he was still at the heights of power and the white house, the kinds of memos that she got compiled, not just trump, but to other senior administration officials, it shows you the degree of influence that not only she had, but her vast conservative
that relationship for the influence she has. and number two, it has not proven, but if they are birds of a feather in the kind of relationship they ve always had, if in any way the justice of the supreme court entertains these views, and has to hear cases, that s head spinning. asawin, you say these interactions have taken on u. s. significance since the january six committee released text messages between meadows and jimmy. how so? well, it s because the tax wish she interacted with trump, when he was still at the heights of power and the white house, the kinds of memos that she got compiled, not just trump, but to other senior administration officials, it shows you the degree of influence that not only she had, but her vast conservative network, which i think isn t waco to say isn t a very far-right network, and other individuals of that look, that is something that i don t think is a mystery to