look at that, there s a whole lot of crazy right there. election deniers. insurrectionists. weirdos, freaks, you have it all. the republican candidates in arizona, all of them extreme, all of them insurrectionists, all of them people who actually don t believe in american democracy. they believe in their form of government, where, well, you only recognize elections where your side wins. and this is what folks on the far right have been working on for quite some time. what this says about trumpism and the future of the republican party. also, a russian court sentences wnba star brittney griner to nine years in prison. we will have reaction from president biden and the latest on efforts to get her home. and monkeypox now declared a national public health emergency. we ll speak with a top health adviser about this later this morning. willie, we have a lot to talk about. we also have some polls out of ohio. it seems that butter is down by 10 or 11 points, according to h
Over half of the Democrats in the House and 14 Democrats in the Senate are calling for enactment of a new government-run health coverage program to replace all existing private health insurance, including employer-sponsored health benefits, as well as the current publicly funded coverage for Americans enrolled in Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).
Vietnam has enjoyed substantial export growth to members of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) in the three years since it came into effect.
tax. they got an income tax refund for taxes they had paid in earlier years. on the right side, you can see in the dark bluish colored bar that that meant they actually had a negative effective tax rate, these 39 companies. what this bill would do would be to impose a minimum 15% tax on all companies that make over $1 billion and strip away a lot of the tax preferences they got under the tcja from that calculation. the compromise with sinema does trim this slightly. i won t get into the technical details. not changes i would have made, but not fundamentally changing the nature of this. what she did do in response to your question about carried interest was she took away the carried interest took away the removal of the carried interest provision. it is not a lot of money. it was only $14 billion over ten years. but it was one of the it is one of the most unfair