now back to life, liberty and levin. . mark: professor, reynolds, i am not opposed to prosecutors or criminal laws, or violating people who break laws. i am all for it. i do not support is criminalization of politics in the totalitarian tactics against one individual. i briefly mentioned joe biden and his tax returns, do you think that local prosecutors will look at his tax returns. i am unqualified to offer a tax opinion, but it surprising how small a splash it made, the press is pretty much drives the narrative.
levin. mark: professor, reynolds, i am not opposed to prosecutors or criminal laws, or violating people who break laws. i am all for it. i do not support is criminalization of politics in the totalitarian tactics against one individual. i briefly mentioned joe biden and his tax returns, do you think that local prosecutors will look at his tax returns. i am unqualified to offer a tax opinion, but it surprising how small a splash it made, the press is pretty much drives the narrative. mark: you made a points, that is
one thing that made the list, supreme court decisions which is interesting. is there one you re looking for in particular, something you ll be watching next year? well, i m really watching for that tax opinion as i told you. i think that s the most important not only because it is important to the investigations in manhattan and the house investigations but also to really resolve the question, is the president above the law. the president made this statement that he can shoot a person on fifth avenue, couldn t even be investigated. i don t happen to think that s true. i don t think there s legal support for that, but we re going to find out what justice roberts, how much he can depoliticize the court and make a ruling on is the president above the law. nothing is more important for me in the supreme court. cynthia, good to see you. happy new year, my friend. appreciate it. happy new year. thank you for watching this hour of msnbc. i hope all of you have a healthy and happy 2020
responsible for my family. i live in alpine, utah. have you sought advisory opinion from the irs that it is a legal tax behavior of yours. no, no. to not declare that as income? i have not sought a tax opinion from the irs, no. would you seek advisory letter from the irs as to whether or not you can derive that additional in kind income from the house of representatives without declaring it on your tax return. i have not sought to do that. will you seek to do it tomorrow, write a letter to the irs director? i don t think so. we will ask for that advisory opinion for you, congressman. by the way, $174,000. does your wife have any income or is that your total family income? total family income. and you cannot afford on $174,000 a way to live in washington legally without becoming a tax criminal in the process? boy, you got up on the right
responsible for my family. i live in alpine, utah. have you sought advisory opinion from the irs that it is a legal tax behavior of yours. no, no. to not declare that as income? i have not sought a tax opinion from the irs, no. would you seek advisory letter from the irs as to whether or not you can derive that additional in kind income from the house of representatives without declaring it on your tax return. i have not sought to do that. will you seek to do it tomorrow, write a letter to the irs director? i don t think so. we will ask for that advisory opinion for you, congressman. by the way, $174,000. does your wife have any income or is that your total family income? total family income. and you cannot afford on $174,000 a way to live in washington legally without becoming a tax criminal in the process?