that this was the great achievement of those years. and it s one, i think, that is mainstream as is possible to be in america at this point. and sometimes i think, you know, this stuff sounds okay on paper in a conference in a conference room at the federalist society where they re still debating marbury versus madison. but it just doesn t work in modern america. and it ends up making sessions and cornyn and these guys looking like they re from another century and another planet. it just doesn t work in the modern context. just as tawny was not entirely wrong when he i m waiting for that. all right. if she s a shoo-in as she seems to be despite this, is the news here not open to the public, even the gopers who don t face primaries need to have their credentials stamped by the tea party or whoever is to the right of the tea party for november? well, maybe yes, but i don t think even for the tea partiers this is the way to do it for the most part. if they wanted to really get the
minorities and sexual minorities and so forth. the idea of, again, equal justice under law. that this was the great achievement of those years. and it s one, i think, that is mainstream as is possible to be in america at this point. and sometimes i think, you know, this stuff sounds okay on paper in a conference in a conference room at the federalist society where they re still debating marbury versus madison. but it just doesn t work in modern america. and it ends up making sessions and cornyn and these guys looking like they re from another century and another planet. it just doesn t work in the modern context. just as tawny was not entirely wrong when he i m waiting for that. if she s a shoo-in as she seems to be despite this, is the news here not open to the public, even the gopers who don t face primaries need to have their credentials stamped by the tea
the idea of broadly interpreting individual rights to include racial minorities and religious minoriies and sexual minorities and so forth. the idea of, again, equal justice under law. that this was the great achievement of those years. and it s one, i think, that is mainstream as is possible to be in america at this point. and sometimes i think, you know, this stuff sounds okay on paper in a conference in a conference room at the federalist society where they re still debating marbury versus madison. but it just doesn t work in modern america. and it ends up making sessions and cornyn and these guys looking like they re from another century and another planet. it just doesn t work in the modern context. just as tawny was not entirely wrong when he i m waiting for that. if she s a shoo-in as she seems to be despite this, is the news here not open to the public, even the gopers who don t face primaries need to have their credentials stamped by the tea party of whoever is to the ri