and it wasn t against the policy. the question is why did you take it down if you had no reason of a violation to remove it? i think this goes, two points jordan is trying to make. one you are making a political contribution to joe biden by suppressing the story and you can t make a millions of dollar contribution and removing this story from one of the main platforms of the public square in america? that s one issue. the second issue he brought up last was he is showing the connection between the federal government, f.b.i. and twitter. and it begs the question how did the congress respond after we learned from this hearing all the involvement of the f.b.i.? what next steps have to happen to make sure this doesn t happen again? one other point. i find it fascinating that democrats aren t joining in the effort to say you know what? this is contrary to the american principle. it might happen to republicans today but might happen to us tomorrow. we should preserve everybody s
were today but they were powerful enough to silence an american president with a few clicks from their california office and learning that some of those in washington, d.c. have forgotten their role and exercised their power to achieve ends, the f.b.i. is the lead federal agency responsible for investigating foreign influence operations, however in recent years they have devoted countless amounts of time, taxpayer money and manpower to combating russian foreign influence on social media. the f.b.i. as one reporter noted acted as a doorman to social media surveillance and censorship with agencies across the federal government from the state department, pentagon to c.i.a. thousands of reports from the f.b.i. and the foreign affairs harris: you saw the tail end of alexandria ocasio-cortez of new york also talking about what republicans are doing and going
all right. harris: oh my goodness. all that for nothing for him to capitulate and saying no, what i said wasn t true, it is off the books. it s safe. wow. could he say he is sorry for not telling the truth? no. the president made some other questionable claims about the debt limit, jobs and taxes and the new york post is not being gentle. the cover blaring joe liden saying it lost count of all the fibs he told during that address. fox business correspondent edward lawrence is live from the white house, one of my favorite fact checkers. very interesting speech when it comes to the facts that were put out there. stubborn president we saw last night much like the construction equipment at the white house. house speaker kevin mccarthy warned the president not to go after republicans. the president did that when he said republicans wanted to cancel or cut medicare and social security.
trump. it is reflexively where they go. they want to know who called twitter and all of that. do they not see the complicit nature that republicans are trying to show the public? americans can see it from the wider media, the suppression of facts before a presidential election around a candidate, then joe biden in 2020, and the movement of the feds to try to tell twitter what its policy is or should be to take down material to censor. it is not a free and open press and we know that. some media members were willing to be part of all of us losing some of our freedoms in the press. most of it, in fact. fascinating. i wanted you to see the democrats go after trump at a hearing that is literally all about getting to the bottom of what was going on with a
of things that he was trying to reach across the aisle but there were also things that he hammered republicans on. that social security and medicare to go back to that. the fact that he had at the end and walked it back a little bit and said okay, so we re all on the same page and everybody stood up and had an ovation. he is ready to go to florida and that speech writer writing a speech using a line that republicans are coming after social security and medicare has to go back to the drawing board after the visual of everybody standing up and saying we aren t going to touch it. harris: i will see you on your set in d.c. tonight. i m coming down for an event at the smithsonian. see you in a few hours. i will cut in now because aoc is at the twitter exec hearing with oversight. let s dip into that. i ll see you later. bomb threat to the boston children s hospital. yes, i am aware. this account is still on that