his full throttle attempt to overturn the presidential election. by taking the precious time on this case, the justices have actually halted donald trump s federal election interference trial. that means that a deverdict is less likely before november s election. beyond justice delayed this case could reshape the presidency also and axios explains. quote, the next week may redefine the limits of presidential power for generations to come. andrew weissman and melissa murray are kicking off another hour back with us. i would just like to ask how how is this even a thing, melissa? if anyone listened to the oral arguments, donald trump asked his his lawyers are asking the justices to say you know, they gave examples of you can shoot someone and assassinate someone and a president could order an assassination and that should be covered because he needs immunity. that s a crime. so first of all, that s exactly right. some of the arguments that were made at that oral argument
we are expecting more decisions by the supreme court, including the one that we are waiting for. this is not the week to check out this coming week. it is not. alicia, look at the smile on her face, she is ready. i am sad that symone sanders-townsend is not here because we were dressed like twins and that michael was rotating around us. now i am wondering, are you icarus? are you flying too close? don t do that. i will pull you back. it is a burn. have a fantastic time and we will see you back here next week. velshi starts now. good morning. to sunday, june 23. in a few days, joe biden and but donald trump will face off against each other the first showdown since the 27 election cycle. the men will be in atlanta to participate in the first of two scheduled general election debates this season. it will last 90 minutes, both campaigns have agreed for to take place in a television studio without an audience present. take place one month after donald trump was convicted
i am alicia menendez with symone sanders-townsend and michael steele. ahead of the supreme court, has donald trump already won his immunity case before it was decided? biden on offense . the most pointed criticism yet. inside project 2025, our deep dive into the conservative plan to reshape american government forever. grab your coffee, settle in. welcome in to the weekend . this week, as my microphone tries to fall off, the supreme court did not release the decision on trump s presidential immunity claim, giving a boost to the ex- president s delay tactics and stalling the federal election interference case against him. the trial started on march 4, as originally scheduled and we could have had averted by now attorney marc elias says the supreme court has silently created a new form of immunity for donald trump, immunity by delay. joining us now is the guru, senior writer, mark joseph stern. we need to add that to your bayou. the question, i think, remains f
the options are endless. thanks for joining us i m sandra smith. i think gillian is taken over for martha. i am. thank you guys. afternoon. i m gillian turner in for martha maccallum. this is the story. another young life brutally cut short in america once again investigators say the suspects are men who crossed the border into the us illegally. 12-year-old jocelyn found dead in a creek in houston friday pick the feds tell fox to make venezuela man charged in her murder were arrested then released by border patrol in the last few months. feds confirming the suspect in the rape and murder of rachel morin 37-year-old mother of 5 in maryland made it into the country as a so-called got away. after border patrol and tried to send him back to mexico 3 separate times. here s also this. the suspect in the rape of a 13-year-old girl in new york city arrested and released after crossing the border illegally. a judge ordered him deported more than 2 years ago. obviously he never w
very good to be with you. i m alex witt in for katy tur. what jack smith s case, that is the question being batted around before judge aileen cannon in court today as major questions about her own role in the trial hang over proceedings. there is still no trial date in sight. instead, to the frustration of many, cannon is hearing out what several legal experts have called another long shot argument to dismiss charges against the former president. yesterday, the new york times reported cannon rejected urges from two federal judges that she not take the case when it was firsthanded to her last june. the question is why, when a huge chunk of her rulings have drawn criticism from the prosecution and legal scholars. is it inexperience, she was only on the bench just over a year. is it potential bias? she has shown unusual favor to trump by intervening in the mar-a-lago investigation before he was indicted or is it simply judge cannon s way of proceeding over such a high stakes h