Cybercrime is enormously profitable and its a great big deal and very big business. Companies are not doing enough to defend themselves but on the other hand a lot of threats are overhyped. There is an anonymous Security Industrial complex supplying weapons to the u. S. Military, the lobbying force for some of these merconium laws. At the same time there is real stuff that needs to be sold to real companies. An essay is not doing a lot to defend the country. Thats not really their mission. Their job is to defend military government networks. They have not been tasked with defending the broader internet. Thats probably good things that we cant judge them on that. Theres a lot going on here. How do we compare this with Climate Change . Your guess is as good as mine. Climate change is the single most catastrophic threat we are facing that is 100 years out. We as people cannot do fret analyses 100 years out. We can barely do it to the next harvest. We are not equipped as people to do that.
Counter that kind of warfare. First of all, there is no need to develop or create a specific picture of russia to reinvigorate our alliance. I think it is quite obvious to everybody why nato is needed. We need a strong collective defense to protect their populations against any kind of threat. So i would argue that it is russia herself that creates a very particular picture right now. In me remind you that november 2010 at the nato russia summit in lisbon, we decided to develop a true Strategic Partnership between nato and russia. We have done a lot more in the last 20 years to develop a constructive for operation with russia, because we do believe that a positive engagement with russia is the right way forward. Just to discover that russia sees it differently, and if you read the Russian Military doctrines, they point to nato not as a partner, but as an adversary. So it is russia that creates this particular picture. Finally, on the open door me put it this, let way, at the end of the
House debateek the or can on Training Programs and forgy and water projects 2015. You can see the house live on cspan and the senate on cspan2. Another item is to renew the highway trust fund. It expires at the end of august. The department of transportation is more that allowing the trust fund to go broke would cost the u. S. 700,000 jobs. Twice there than number created last month. It will begin cutting back payments to state and local governments next month. That article is in the hill today. Theres a look on the Israeli Palestinian conflict. The Wilson Center will host the discussion later today. 4 00coverage starts at p. M. Eastern time on cspan. The internet should remain free from regulation. Said, itcrawford has is like confusing the conversation for the sidewalk. We want the conversation to be on regulated. A they have always made sure that the communications pathways stay open. We have a regulated phone system. The fcc does not regulate what i say to you what i call you, but
All weekend long on booktv. For a complete schedule visit booktv. Org. In 1936, five years before they published let us now praise famous men, james agee and photographer walker evans produced a feature article for Fortune Magazine titled cotton tenants. It was about three poor families in alabama living through the great depression. The 30,000 word article and accompanying photos were never published by fortune, but cotton tenants was discovered decades later in a collection of agees manuscripts housed at the university of tennessee. During this event hosted by the Jimmy Carter Library and museum, editor john summers leads a Panel Discussion about the book and the work of james agee and walker evans. Carter library, president ial library here in atlanta, georgia. Im thrilled to be moderating this illustrious panel tonight. I think we will begin by introducing the book that we are going to be talking about, cotton tenants. James agee, walker evans. We will get started. In 1936, Fortune
Im just really sorry im sorry for it to be anyone, but im really sorry, again, my condolences to his family. Major general gene had his masters in National Security policy, also a ph. D. In the engineering field. He was one of more than a dozen people struck, the only one to die, in an attack for which we still have very few answers at this point. Lieutenant tony schafer has experience dating back more than a decade about these socalled insider attacks. What happened here . Simply put, i think you had an infill traitor who was either recruited or became subjected to the talibans influence while he was in the army. He took it upon himself. At this point, theres no direct evidence he was directed. But he took it upon himself to essentially kill the invader, which is the perception that the taliban has put forth about our efforts there in afghanistan. First off, condolences to general greens family. This was truly an outstanding general. You all know i dont pull any punches here regarding