To convene a closed session. Is there a motion . Second. All commissioners in favor. We are now in closed session. This is the building inspection commission. We are on item 8d, motion to reconvene in open station to vote on whether to disclose any our all discussions held in closed session. Move to reconvene and continue the item until next month. Second. There is a motion and second to reconvene the item to the next meeting. And not to disclose. All commissioners in favor. Item 9 is adjournment. Is there a motion to adjourn . Move to adjourn. Second. We are now adjourned. It is 10 55 a. M. Good morning, everyone. The meeting will come to order. Welcome to the september 30th, 2019, meeting of the rules committee. Im supervisor hillary ronen, chair of the committee. Seated to my right is rules Committee Vice chair Shamann Walton and seated to my left is rules Committee Member supervisor gordon mar. We are joined by supervisor aaron peskin. Our clerk is linda wong, filling in for victor
October 8th. Thank you. Clerk item number one. An ordinance amending the administrative code to add a preference in City Affordable Housing programs to tenants temporarily evicted from rental units for Capital Improvements or rehabilitation work. And requiring landlords who regain possession of such rental units to provide evidence of complying with a tenants right to reoccupy such tenants rental unit. Thank you, colleagues, for hearing this item last week, where we heard testimony from the community about the impact since 2017 of some 400 over 400 temporary Capital Improvement displacements or evictions. Many of which have gone well beyond the threemonth time limit for temporary displacements. As to supervisor mars question, i believe that we actually were able to provide data later last monday. And the temporary evictions have largely and often become permanent displacements which have had the added effect of not only pushing tenants out of their homes, but also taking rentcontrolled
Commissioner stephanie. Just on rider accountability, not the company, but rider accountability for the person whos violating and riding the scooter on the sidewalk or has two people on the scooter or is putting the scooter on its side on the sidewalk or parking it obstructing the sidewalk, what is the accountability for the rider and what are we doing to enforce it through our own means, not through the operator. On the parking side, it is a violation of the transportation code to park a scooter improperly. That is something that can be enforced by the sfmta and we do Issue Citations for improperly parked scootered for a scooter program. Those citations are investigate. They will go out and issue the citations. Directly issuing a citation to someone on the sidewalk is a moving violation and would have to come through a p. D. Thats why we have relied on the operatorbased system of them finding users directly and suspending accounts. Where p. D. Has resources, issuing the citations is g
Appear on the board of supervisors agenda on october 8th. Thank you. Clerk item number one. An ordinance amending the administrative code to add a preference in City Affordable Housing programs to tenants temporarily evicted from rental units for Capital Improvements or rehabilitation work. And requiring landlords who regain possession of such rental units to provide evidence of complying with a tenants right to reoccupy such tenants rental unit. Thank you, colleagues, for hearing this item last week, where we heard testimony from the community about the impact since 2017 of some 400 over 400 temporary Capital Improvement displacements or evictions. Many of which have gone well beyond the threemonth time limit for temporary displacements. As to supervisor mars question, i believe that we actually were able to provide data later last monday. And the temporary evictions have largely and often become permanent displacements which have had the added effect of not only pushing tenants out o
Companies to discipline those that are riding on the sidewalk by not allowing them to use it again . We have asked the companies that same question. What weve been told is the accuracy of g. P. S. Equipment right now is plus or minus 6 to 10 feet and thats not accurate in most cases to pin down what is or is not sidewalk riding to do user enforcement or penalties. Theyve all promised to continue to develop that technology. I dont know when it would be available. So in the meantime were doing the best we can with the tools we have. If there are more Technology Tools out there for automatically detecting sidewalk riding we would love to see. Maybe what we need to do locally is to create legislation to say if they they need to create this technology, otherwise we wont give them a permit. Commissioner stephanie. Just on rider accountability, not the company, but rider accountability for the person whos violating and riding the scooter on the sidewalk or has two people on the scooter or is