if reckalators force them to do to cost money they will raise it. democrats and republicans are bashing the banks. it is the most cynical kind of attack on any business. when the government whalops a line of revenue, you owe it to the shareholders to make up the revenue. if the politicians who did this. this is a bipartisan effort decided to do it without fees being raised elsewhere. they are either fibbing or worst and lame on economic policy that we feared. the problem is, the banks took all of the money in the tarp bailout and making trades and buying gold and foreign curiencies . so dick durbin is playing to a sympathetic crowd, no? seriously. i mean, these banks can afford the fees.
the tea party. and he is a senator who voted for the tarp bailout in 2008. there were practices on wall street that were just terrible. back to ceos getting paid a fortune when they go out the door. that sends a message to people who are almost unemployment or under employed. america is a place where america tries to judge fairness. we don t need fairness to get you have got something and i m angry about it. the last thing we need is more polarization. you can express your differences but at the end of the day we have to come together as a country. when you look at our challenges, they are staggering. who is at risk? my 11-year-old twin daughter. when i left congress we were $5
well, we have to be sure there is defense spending in there because we have to have something to make the republicans look at a more balanced approach, and here is the thing well, shouldn t medicare be in there to make democrats have a balanced approach? yes, i have been one of the democrats to say we have to look at entitlement reform, but there is one thing that is telling warren buffett, we will not buy his prescription drugs and converting it into a voucher program. we can do things to preserve them, and protect the beneficiaries and the benefits without gutting them, and that is the case. if we balanced approach, we can preserve the prom gragrad get them to where we can prolong them, and we cannot keep pushing public money to big oil and don t want to address the other issues. senator thune, september 28th, 2009 was an important date and debate which was the t.a.r.p. bailout of the banks. s
republicans begin to look at a more balanced approach. and here s shouldn t medicare be in there, too, making sure democrats look at a balanced approach? absolutely. i m one of the democrats saying we have to look at entitlement reform, but david, there s a big difference between telling warren buffett we re not going to buy his prescription drugs anymore and converting it to a voucher program. there are things we can do with both social security and medicare that will preserve them, protect them, protect the beneficiaries, protect the benefits, without gutting them. and that s really the case. if we have a balanced approach, we will preserve those programs as we know them and we ll be able to get at our long-term debt structure. both have to be on the table. we can t keep going down a road where they want to keep pushing more public money to big oil but don t want to address the other issues. senator thune, september 29th, 2008, was an important debate, an important day. that
result. could you live with that? well, i think we have to make sure there is defense spending in there, because we ve got to have something to make the republicans begin to look at a more balanced approach. and here s shouldn t medicare be in there, too, making sure democrats look at a balanced approach? absolutely. i m one of the democrats saying we have to look at entitlement reform, but there s a difference between telling warren buffett we re not going to buy his prescription drugs anymore and converting it to a voucher program. there are things we can do with both social security and medicare that will preserve them, protect them, protect the beneficiaries, protect the benefits, without gutting them. and that s really the case. if we have a balanced approach, we will preserve those programs as we know them and we ll be able to get at our long-term debt structure. both have to be on the table. we can t keep going down a road where they want to keep pushing more public mo