an apen detective who needs surgery. you know that bill will be in excess of $100,000. if you probably know people who have become personally bankrupt because of that. we have the capacity to take care of these people. why not do it? the answer to that is with all due respect, we are going see those patients. i see those patients and you see those patients. we see them whether they pay or not. about it hospital s bottom line does not improvew if a watered down medicaid cuts payments to the hospitals. the reality is they will do worse under obama-care and that s the problem. i would agree with you. i m in favor of a broader insurance coverage for all americans to make it but we need to make it affordable. the best way to do that, having
of all institutions, and in 1987 when the price of bread was increased during the time of former egyptian president sadad. ben, are you looking at this picture? it seems that they are overtaking the military vehicle. well, they are overtaking it but not in an aggressive or violent way. more they are chanting their support for the army. so what is the goal here? the army is controlled by president mubarak, right? so they respect the army but not the president. how does that jive with each other? well, of course, it s the head of the army is president hosni mubarak. but it s seen as an institution in and of itself, not as an apen damage of the president. and, of course, egyptians
review panel of some kind to look at people s status. so, i m not sure you re correct about that. you have to here is where you are mistaken. they are going to aggregate like they do now things that are going on in the health care economy. but they won t know a single thing about bill o reilly s health care or anthony weiner s health care. they will go to the hospital and say how many gallbladders taken out. which procedures were more or less efficient? what kind of rates did you have. to say that people are going to lose control over health records is deceptive. it really is but the point that you are fundamentally making bill: woe, woe, woe. if there is a controversial about a procedure that procedure is out of the american s hands doctor s hands it s in the federal government s hands. you are misunderstanding. right now for the past 50 years, tomorrow, we are always going to be, since we are big providers of health care, we in the federal government, but to taxpayers with
people who had apen diets and figured out what worked best. there is nothing in the bill that does what you said, bill. let me be clear. bill: let me point out. that s not what the other side is saying. we will see how it pans out. there is enormous i will tell you something, bill. there is enormous amount that others on the other side are saying are just lies. we have to be careful not to have false debate. bill: the irs is now going to have to enforce obama care. so if you say flip it, i ain t buying it, then the irs is the one that is going to make the determination whether you get fined or what happens to you. so, again, the irs is going to have to have access to information. that is not true. bill: who is going to do that? i m going to explain how the bill works. right now, under this law as passed the other day, if you want to get the tax credit to buy insurance, you will have to stay on your tax form whether or not you are already getting it. we are not going to gi
review panel of some kind to look at people s status. so, i m not sure you re correct about that. you have to here is where you are mistaken. they are going to aggregate like they do now things that are going on in the health care economy. but they won t know a single thing about bill o reilly s health care or anthony weiner s health care. they will go to the hospital and say how many gallbladders taken out. which procedures were more or less efficient? what kind of rates did you have. to say that people are going to lose control over health records is deceptive. it really is but the point that you are fundamentally making bill: woe, woe, woe. if there is a controversial about a procedure that procedure is out of the american s hands doctor s hands it s in the federal government s hands. you are misunderstanding. right now for the past 50 years, tomorrow, we are always going to be, since we are big providers of health care, we in the federal government, but to taxpayers with