out of all these, i get away with it more than i get caught, that s for sure. samson s tattoo write-ups have cost him more than 200 days in earned good time. but he says the extra time in prison is worth it. the time i ve lost by getting caught doing what i m doing is well worth the sanity that i would have lost if i had just done what they said and walked the line. shut my mouth and went to my house and did nothing and just sat there and watched my tv. i m more at ease with myself. i respect myself a lot more for having done what i want to do in here. that s my outlet, that s my escape. it s always been fascinating to me how these guys manage to get tattoos in prison. not only the items they need to do the tattoos, but the fact that they can get away with doing tattoos. any small wire can be straightened out and made into a needle. you can get motors out of appliances, tape recorders, cameras. along with needles, tattooing
sheela had installed surveillance devices everywhere in the commune. every pay phone in the town was tapped and almost every building. this is the largest incident of wiretapping in the history of the united states. they wired this whole town. they this banks of tape recorders running all the time. indescribable. most of them didn t know they were being monitored. i was kept quiet by the inner circle which held their meetings on her round bed. a bookcase concealed a metal door opening into a tunnel. or in secret rooms, complete with escape tunnels. the fbi also found a number of manuals for making bombs and doing dirty tricks and they
chief justice john roberts said that today s phones aren t just phones, they could just as easily be called cameras, rolodexes, tape recorders, diaries, newspapers. he left out fax machines. therefore, a cell phone search would typically expose to the government far more than the most exhaustive search of a house. a search of a house typically requires a search warrant. so the search of a phone should also require a search warrant. of course, the court also noted how easy it is for police to get a war an these days. sometimes all they have to do is e-mail a judge. the court said no warrant is necessary when there s an immediate threat of danger. still, this was a big good moment for the court today. a victory for privacy, and the big victory for common sense. and the biggest and most controversial case of this entire term, the one we ve been covering and waiting for, the case over weather corporations have actual first amendment
phones, they could just as easily be called cameras, rolodexes, tape recorders, diaries, newspapers. he left out fax machines. therefore, a cell phone search would typically expose to the government far more than the most exhaustive search of a house. a search of a house typically requires a search warrant. so the search of a phone should also require a search warrant. of course, the court also noted how easy it is for police to get a war an these days. sometimes all they have to do is e-mail a judge. the court said no warrant is necessary when there s an immediate threat of danger. still, this was a big good moment for the court today. a victory for privacy, and the big victory for common sense. and the biggest and most controversial case of this entire term, the one we ve been covering and waiting for, the case over weather corporations have actual first amendment religious protections, that case, the decision is going to
arrest unless they get a warrant. the courts opinion, authored by chief justice john roberts said that today s phones aren t just phones, they could just as easily be called cameras, rolodexes, tape recorders, diaries, newspapers. he left out fax machines. therefore, a cell phone search would typically expose to the government far more than the most exhaustive search of a house. a search of a house typically requires a search warrant. so the search of a phone should also require a search warrant. of course, the court also noted how easy it is for police to get a war an these days. sometimes all they have to do is e-mail a judge. the court said no warrant is necessary when there s an immediate threat of danger. still, this was a big good moment for the court today. a victory for privacy, and the big victory for common sense. and the biggest and most controversial case of this entire term, the one we ve been covering and waiting for, the case over weather corporations have actual first a