the receipts showing exactly what the agents found, catalogued and took, seized because it wasn t trump s property from the property compound you see on your screen. that includes 11 sets of classified documents, some at the highest level of classification. one set marked top secret sci, top secret compartmentalized info and they are only to be viewed at special facilities and mar-a-lago is not one of them. there are three sets of secret and three confidential. all of this comes after donald trump returned what looks like the partial amount according to the government not authorized to be there. 15 boxes that went back in january. now on this basically third go around, they re still finding top secret documents. property receipt does not explain the substance because the government doesn t want everyone to know what is in there. washington post reporting fbi agents were looking for classified documents that could relate to nuclear weapons when they carried out the search. nbc
retained it. they all-star jerry 20th, 2020, won the day he left office. most of them and june 3rd, 2022, the day that they went the doj went down to mar-a-lago to meet with evan corcoran. what s the date on it of? joe 20 of the children to, the same day that trump returned the first tranche of boxes to the national archives. we know that because it s in the indictment as well. what does that suggest? what do you draw from that? that they had this document in their possession for a while. they didn t charge on it, initially. they might not have known that was the document and we were discussing earlier tonight with tally weinstein, that is the document, a witness confirmed, i saw it a meeting in bedminster in july of 2020. one and they can now they can bring the episode to the trial. that seems important for a block opinion. the whole thing with this case is, will how grave is it? how serious is it?
the day that they went the doj went down to mar-a-lago to meet with evan corcoran. what s the date on it of? joe 20 of the children to, the same day that trump returned the first tranche of boxes to the national archives. we know that because it s in the indictment as well. what does that suggest? what do you draw from that? that they had this document in their possession for a while. they didn t charge on it, initially. they might not have known that was the document and we were discussing earlier tonight with tally weinstein, that is the document, a witness confirmed, i saw it a meeting in bedminster in july of 2020. and they can now they can bring the episode to the trial. that seems important for a block opinion. the whole thing with this case is, will how grave is it? how serious is it? and now they can bring into the courtroom, in florida, this is how serious it was. u.s. military plans to attack iran and the president was waving them around to just anybody just so that he
quote, thirsting for violence, that s how prosecutors described the five members of the proud boys on trial for their role in the january 6th attack it comes after more than 50 days of testimony from more than three dozen witnesses. joining us now, nbc justice reporter ryan reilly, also the author of the fourth coming book sedition hunters and with us, tally weinstein. this started back in december. boil down the closing arguments for us what are you hearing reporter: like you said, prosecutors are arguing that essentially this group was organizing for action and preparing for violence ahead of january 6th. what they told jurors is there doesn t have to be an explicit plan ahead of time, that individuals that went to the capitol that day and decided to participate in pry lens might have formed an instant k
pregnancy, carry this pregnanc through to term, she wants t get away from this men number one, the fact that he has access to these text messages, and that these women now are being charged with sue for wrongful death the actual effects of that are profound indeed, alex, there s s many red flags here. we were just learning about th silva family, we were just looking at what you read, i reminded of when sva first wen into effect. so many advocates who work o domestic violence were worried that this could be another instrument of what we call power in control over th person in your house tha you re abusing you could say, if you re tryin to get an abortion, i m gonn sue your sister and your mom and your friend and whoever is in your circle of support. so, the whole tone of it raise that, and one when i was a prosecutor, one of the thing