been hitting paul so hard. it s also interesting comment on so far this season people have been relatively inf ineffective make an attack on romney. up on within hand that is an advantage to romney because they try to lay a glove on him and they haven t. on the other hand, he hasn t had to confront the issues on a way he has to confront them in the general election. you know, it has helped him in the primary but i hope his team is thinking about the attack that might have been in the primary and how they will respond to them in the general election. greta: now a question of two do you like sub stanively, who do you agree with and who is your candidate. curious, from a strategic, look at their background and their talln t and shortcoming who is the strongest political candidate going in the election? i trust the judgment of the polls of republicans more than i trust anybody, any single
been hitting paul so hard. it s also interesting comment on so far this season people have been relatively inf ineffective make an attack on romney. up on within hand that is an advantage to romney because they try to lay a glove on him and they haven t. on the other hand, he hasn t had to confront the issues on a way he has to confront them in the general election. you know, it has helped him in the primary but i hope his team is thinking about the attack that might have been in the primary and how they will respond to them in the general election. greta: now a question of two do you like sub stanively, who do you agree with and who is your candidate. curious, from a strategic, look at their background and their talln t and shortcoming who is the strongest political candidate going in the election? i trust the judgment of the polls of republicans more than i trust anybody, any single
he has been doing that for years. they clearly have waived that. but first one is different. that s the point you are going to make mark, go. there is no question he gave a personal opinion. we don t have some debate whether it s right or wrong or the public shares that same view. he gave a personal opinion on a controversial issue and it s against their policy. do they have the legal right to fire him? if it s the right move, that s not the issue. legally they are on solid footing. it has nothing to do with the policy. the company can t say you violated a policy when you sign sad contract. what can we surmise might be in that contract? typically with a talln t like this you would have a for cause termination. that s something like you have stolen from the company, you wasted assets. we are talking about what s typical. what did he do here? he gave an honest response. this has a chilling effect.