expressing her family love. things got a little hairy after liz told fox news that gay couples should not be allowed to marry. her sister is gay and married. she took to her facebook page, saying liz has been a guest in her home, to have her now say she doesn t support our right to marry is offensive, to say the least. the sisters have not spoken since the summer. well, now comes father knows best who yet appears to reprimand them for talking out of turn. we were surprised when there was an attack launched against liz, on facebook. and wished it had not happened. and do believe we dealt with the situation and lived with it for many years. it always has been dealt with within the context of the
it debackground. you go to hundreds of sources and say, tell me everything, we re not going to use your name or even say you know say attributed to campaign aide or journalist, we re going to take what you tell us and put it in a book as an account. right? so the sources are protected from being exposed for talking out of turn? yeah, absolutely. and, you know, what readers should keep in mind when they re reading a book like this is every presidential campaign to some extent becomes kind of a competition. many people in the course of the campaign are thinking about their next gig. they re thinking, i m going to get this guy elected and what am i going to do? how much can i charge? how good am i going to look coming out of this? how do i mitigate that coming out of this? and deep, deep background can t be got to be clear, can t be anywhere near me. right. anywhere near me.
people. it took a while. with ed rollins comment i don t get why carpetbagging in wyoming is harder to do than say in new york. we ll put that aside. i think it s an absurd attack on liz cheney. she obviously has roots to the state of wyoming. her father is clearly popular there. he s been there. doesn t make sense to me. i think it was a stupid comment. i m sure he would want to take it back for the sexist undertones obviously. what i ve been surprised about, maybe joe could add here, how little how poor a reception liz cheney has had within republican circles to her entrance into the race. that might be because there s a sitting senator there, perhaps they thought it was not the right time, she was talking out of turn, but i have a sense it s a little deeper than that, that people aren t exactly enamored with the cheney name within the republican party. joe, add to that question, the fact that it did seem a little awkward at first because there s a sitting senator who s popular
kind of language. how do you respond to the choice of language? for the job, i mean, look. you re on par with the leadership nationally of both parties. you ve got to have a certain level of decorum and respect. i think there were other ways to express that harry reid was talking out of turn. could say if you ve got the evidence, put up those individuals and let s go from there. but that s part of the problem. when you get into the name calling and that silliness, then you ve taken the debate to another level. then you become part of the story as opposed to the point you re trying to make. governor rendell, the fact of the matter is and i will take it that michael is saying he disagrees with the choice of language. absolutely, reverend. let me be clear. i believe that is not appropriate language if you are the leader of a national party to say about a leader of the opposition party. in any way, shape, or form.
enemy. george w. bush is gone. we don t have i don t know mccain to kick around anymore. filling the lack of leadership on the right fox news emerged as the central enemy and antagonist of the obama administration. our congressional majorities and progressive movement as a whole we must take fox news head on in a well-orchestrated, well-funded presidential-style campaign to discredit and embarass the network, making it illegitimate in the eyes of news consumers. jim, does that sound like the work of a tax-free organization? it doesn t. and i have to tell you, jon, last year, david brock, the president of media matters was quoted as saying i, him talking now, i want to engage in a quote, guerrilla war and sabotage, unquote, campaign against fox. that is kind of a little bit heavy for a charity as shannon said, a educational charitable, charity. i assumed it was just him talking out of turn. talking a little bit of a position of instability. now i realize thanks to this