mike pompeo three times had a summit with kim jong un, cancelled military exercises. this president has bent over backwards to try to make this work. ed: you see democrats already saying ah-ha another failure tort president is he not going to get this done. they seem to forget what happened a year ago president talking north korea little kim and rocket man is he pushing us into nuclear war. instead it pushed kim jong un to the negotiating table number one. number two, right before the singapore summit, the president abruptly pulled the plug, i m not meeting with him. we are not making enough progress. you heard democrats say he failed, he is not going to have a summit. guess what? that pushed kim jong un back into a corner. he needs the president in singapore. now there is back sliding the and the president pulled the plug again. every time he drops the hammer, kim jong un comes back to the table. we will see. rachel: he is playing a very dynamic game the role of china in here. origina
asking them to give that up is like asking them to give up power. so the question is else is available for to us do. i think there is only one answer and that s for china to be convinced, what they said for years they don t want north korea to have new yarp weapons. the on true answer here is reunifying the peninsula, and we have to convince china of that. but trump s point is absolutely correct. talking north korea will be as fruitless as the first 25. th if they truly believe what they say, let s get on with it. judge jeanine: when president trump even gangs the president of china, as recently as a couple months ago, china was a currency manipulator.
weapons they have to operationalize they fear if he too much pressure on north korea will collapse i think that is right to me, indicates, the only the only true answer here is reunifying peninsula we have to convince china that trump s point is absolutely correct talking north korea year 26 as fruitless as 235irs if china is serious if they truly believe what they say, that they don t want north korea nuclear weapons let s get on with it. so when president trump engages a president of china what leverage recently a couple months ago china was a currency manipulator now president trump and you know to his credit he meets with the man, has a good weekend with him at mar-a-lago great discussions he is an s expert negotiator appears calling in
north korea to have nuclear weapons they have to operationalize they fear if he too much pressure on north korea will collapse i think that is right to me, indicates, the only the only true answer here is reunifying peninsula we have to convince china that trump s point is absolutely correct talking north korea year 26 as fruitless as 235irs if china is serious if they truly believe what they say, that they don t want north korea nuclear weapons let s get on with it. so when president trump engages a president of china what leverage recently a couple months ago china was a currency manipulator now president trump and you know to his credit he meets with the man, has a good weekend with him at mar-a-lago great discussions he is an s expert negotiator appears calling in
to get us in so much more trouble than we need to be in in the world is going to be heading straight for world war iii, is at the reality or is this what we need to do right now to make sure we don t wind up in world war iii? julie: after we went and dropped those tomahawk missiles in syria, i think a lot of people were concerned, are we beginning world war iii? as is contradicting to what president trump then campaigned on, that he doesn t necessarily want to get in every war or every civil war. it s not necessarily against the constitution to go forward and react. the question is now, how many countries do we get involved and where do we draw the line? we are in iraq, afghanistan, syria, talking north korea, it s scary. meghan: dropping bombs in sud so many countries. meghan: i know for one, i