greg: i m greg gutfeldm along withgr judge rain p row, harold ford, dana perino, jesse watters. the white house attackingre republicans after thpue wall street journal dropped a bomb on the crazy old coot in chief. the journal piece is titled behind closed doors, biden show, signs of slipping. 4 it s got 45 sources both democrat and republican who were in the room for biden s private meetings with congressional leaders. joe needs note note cards,cls pauses for extended periods andt closes his eyes for so long that people think he s checked out.uo but you don t have to be behind closed doors to see the obviousp [ crowd noise ]az greg: a timine magazine interview chock-full of senior moments. bumbling biden forgetting facts, mixing up the leaders of china and russia and then challengingd the reporter i to a fight when asked if he s too old. saying i can do it better than anybody you know, you aree looking at me, i can take your too. as usual, morning joe defending senil
The latest Political Developments of the day and interviews with top newsmakers are featured. Were not doing enough. Look at these five people. Heres the thing, john. There is a whole Cottage Industry of distraction folks. This is a distraction from x or distraction from mueller. Im not sure that was the case because there are a lot of fires happening now around this administration. The Robert Mueller, Paul Manafort, Special Counsel, Jeff Sessions fire series is one of them. There is also the election en r interference fire, big deal. I had conversations with folks on the other side of folks on capitol hill, both parties. One consistent theme i heard in relation to election interference, Leadership Starts at the top. I asked point blank, who do you talk to in the white house, who do you talk to in the administration . Nobody, we dont know who the point person is, we dont know what their strategy is. This is somebody who is at a high level over there. This seemed to be a way of the whit
Warrants . The concern grows out of the fact that all of the failures and the and The Information that shouldved been given and wasnt given. And the question being what was the intent . What what washa their intention . Their motivation there. And what we determined was we couldnt definitively say what the motivation was. Are these pretty smart people . Fairly welleducated . At least welleducated. I dont know if theyre smart. I dont know if were very smart to beow honest with you. I was b going to say they have law degrees, right . At least somehe of them do. So you think the woods review for people at this level of the organization. To be clear, the stuff that didnt happen on the woods review was basic stuff. Yeah. You didnt need to be a deeplyexperienced fbi agent to be able to do it the right way. Well, thats my point. So wouldnt you think that would almost be muscle p memory for people who are going through this process to know they had an obligation to go through that . They clear
candidates at the moment. trump tries i believe, but thent he gets pulled into talking e about his trials and everythingn that the democrats have thrown e out them. the debate is three weeks from tomorrow. maybe wero will see them set out this vision but i feel like the country is like where are we going? what are we doing? on immigration, the executive s order, he s not, he is, he s not. and the ukraine.les, they can use the missiles, theyo can, they can t, they won t.isra then on israel biden is like he is, he s not, he is. he s an ally but he s not. and i m thinking is it incoherence as a policy or is the president not being clear in his thinking to tell the people who work for him this is what he wants? that s kind ofth the conclusioni came to after all of that.d. greg: i think this was that was the point that was being made by the people that want him out. jesse, i have a theory i like to share with you.h jesse: pleaseyo.
too i mean epistimological here. but is the absence of evidence always the evidence of absence? no, it isn t. so, can you rule out categorically, unequivocally, and unconditionally that there was no bias here by the fact that you didn t find anything in writing, and none of these chuckleheads looked you in the eye and said i dideh it to get trump? t it s rare that i could tel you, i could unequivocally 100% say this actually happened. so i get it. i will say, somewhat the difference on the opening is we concluded based on the events that mr. prestap opened it. we have not seen in last year s investigation or this investigation looking through