could this murder had been deliberately. she was murdered. i loved sarah. i would never have hurt her. sarah crying because i felt so bad for her. there is just no chance that he had anything to do with it. three trials, three juries. we are scared that the truth may not come out. sometimes the shades are drawn early in a marriage. even for a young couple so in love like newlyweds sarah and ryan. everything in life was still fresh. even at home on your average monday night. after his workday as a sports writer, ryan said he plop down on the sofa on an august night to chill with the bengals preseason opener against green bay. sarah, he says, went upstairs to draw a bat in the bathroom. she liked her calling baths. the young dental hygienists had been tormented with more of her headaches that afternoon. the young couple in the suburban state in that the home that evening had been married for just under four months. 114 days to be exact. they vowed till dea
monkey business over nothing less than the biggest issue of the trial. damp head, dry body. he said that through three is the female jurors had done experiments where they had showered and then air-dried. they were testing of this theory of how quickly a body drives coming out of the trouble shower? yes. at home? at home. if the facts-ing your was correct, the panel had directly violated the judges instruction to consider only what they heard in court. the allegation was jury misconduct, a serious matter. attorney mark runcie ohio innocence project. he saw the juror letter as a way to persuade the judge to grant writing a new trial. it s unusual for a jury to come forward and reveal that they had violated a rule, performed experiments, and brought that into consideration. they began reviewing affidavit about what went on in deliberations. more those foreign statements, the jury set of those taboo
the female jurors had done home experiments where they had showered and air dried. they were testing out this theory of how quickly the body dries coming out of the tub or shower? yes. at home? at home. if the faxing juror was correct, the panel had directly violated the judge s instructions to consider only what they had heard in court. the allegation was jury misconduct, a serious matter. attorney mark godsey runs the ohio innocence project. he saw the juror letter as a way to persuade the judge to grant ryan a new trial. it s unusual for a juror to come forward and say the jurors had violated the rules and performed experiments and brought that into the deliberations. the judge began reviewing affidavits from the jurors about just what went on during the deliberations. in one of those sworn statements, a juror said of those taboo home experiments, the times to air dry influenced my decision. jurors are not supposed to go home and do experiments.
correct, the panel had directly violated the judge s instructions to consider only what they had heard in court. the allegation was jury misconduct, a serious matter. this attorney runs the ohio innocence project. he saw the juror letter as a way to persuade the judge to grant ryan a new trial. it s unusual for a juror to come forward and reveal that the jurors had violated the rule us and performed experiments and brought that into deliberations. the judge began reviewing affidavits from the jurors about just what went on during the deliberations. in one of those sworn statements, a juror said of those taboo home experiments, the times to air dry influenced my decision. jurors are not supposed to go home and do experiments. in the end, the judge agreed. four months after ryan widmer s conviction, he ruled that the husband would get another trial. the not guilty verdict on the aggravated murder count, however, would remain. so the prosecution could only retry him on the second
instructions to consider only what they had heard in court. the allegation was jury misconduct, a serious matter. this attorney runs the ohio innocence project. he saw the juror letter as a way to persuade the judge to grant ryan a new trial. it s unusual for a juror to come forward and say the jurors performed experiments and brought that into the deliberations. the judge began reviewing affidavits from the jurors about just what went on during the deliberations. in one of those sworn statements, a juror said of those taboo home experiments, the times to air dry influenced my decision. jurors are not supposed to go home and do experiments. in the end, the judge agreed. four months after ryan widmer s conviction, he ruled that the husband would get another trial. the not guilty verdict on the aggravated murder count, however, would remain. so the prosecution could only retry him on the second count of unpremeditated murder. his mother scraped together ough cash to post the $400