the dynamic. now house judiciary committee chairman jim jordan maintains then biden campaign adviser and the current secretary of state an antony blinken initiated that letter it? was a total political operation, the laptop story looks to be true. jordan s staff interviewed former cia deputy director michael morell. morell signed the letter and jordan details some of morell s testimony. question, but prior to secretary blinken s call you did not have any intent to write this statement. morell says i did not. okay. so his call triggered? it did, yes. that intent in you? yes. absolutely. committee democrats say, quote: in an effort to smear secretary blinken and sensationalize a 3-year-old tabloid story jim jordan has released cherry picked exsermts of a transcribed interview. to be clear no part of that interview demonstrates that tony blinken or any other biden campaign official asked mike morell to write a letter about hunter biden s laptop. and jordan is requesting more i
platform to run for office, and in a twist of fate, it s mr. trump indicted on criminal charges while mr. salaam runs for office it was karma, he said of mr. trump s legal situation while sitting inside the sugar hill cafe in harlem. i hope he is able to do time, he said, with a hint of mischief in his eyes when mr. trump was indicted recently, mr. salaam expressed a kind of trust in the justice system that few might expect i do not resort to hatred, bias or racism, as you once did, mr. salaam wrote in a message to the former president i am putting my faith in the judicial system to seek out the truth. mr. salaam is still waiting for justice and so is the country. mara, let s talk more about this, but also point out that donald trump is also accused of rape just to add a little it runs so deep you know, it s an extraordinary story. it is an extraordinary tabloid story, new york story, now an american story, but i was really moved watching mr. salaam on the
conversation goes is people are saying that what is a biological woman? i think we know what a biological woman is. and stonewall is not saying anything to change that. what it is saying is that we believe that a trans woman is a woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i am not trying to do is convince people of anything other than that. the other example about women s rights is this tabloid story, but with substance behind it, that people who give birth shouldn t be called mothers. they should be called people who give birth. is that really stonewall s view of the world? so no. this again gets mischaracterized. what stonewall looks to do is to provide organisations with good practice to
biological woman is. and stonewall is not saying anything to change that. what it is saying is that we believe that a trans woman is a woman. 50 believe that a trans woman is a woman. ,, ., , believe that a trans woman is a woman. , w, ., , , believe that a trans woman is a woman. , , .,, , , woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i am woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i am not woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i am not trying - woman. so in this case the rapist is a woman? what i am not trying to l woman. so in this case the rapist is i a woman? what i am not trying to do is convince a woman? what i am not trying to do is convince people a woman? what i am not trying to do is convince people of a woman? what i am not trying to do is convince people of anything - is convince peo
it calls her an outsider. it calls her exotic. let s talk about her from gangland. there was a tabloid story that she came straight out of compton. a part of los angeles which had a fairly rough reputation. that allusion with all of that racialized baggage, it s very potent. i read stuff from certain writers who said, well, we can absolutely understand why he s in love with her and why he fancies her, but don t marry her. it is racism. it s totally racism. i do think that a lot of the press coverage of meghan markle has been, yeah, extraordinarily sour, misogynist, and i would say implicitly racist. that must have been a shock to her and very wounding.