five, falsely accused of raping a white woman, that he ll be going possibly in the building they faced, and be arraigned in the same building while my good friend jon meacham was reading thomas payne, i was reading the bible, what a man shows, he shall also reap. kevin mccarthy appeared to be threatening the manhattan district attorney s office there, looking to investigate investigators, potentially cutting off funding. that s a point we should return to as the morning and days go on i think to jon meacham s point, there is a difference here there is political and legal they are both viable i do think there is concern. the democrats i ve spoken to, including senior members of the white house, who do fear because this case is weakest, if it is brought first, it will be it ll allow trump to paint this
trump s request. he s repaid double, not by the campaign but by the trump organization none of this is reported on fec reports. when i hear people saying this is much to do about nothing, i think about all the members of congress i served with, understanding every single one of them would be charged and sent to jail had they done this. joe, it s a fair point. let s be clear, this is a state investigation so it d be a state crime, not a federal one, but i take your point. here s how it works. it s not the hush money payment that s illegal that may seem improper, it may be vile, but it s not illegal. what would be illegal is the way you treat that hush money payment on your books and records. so if you re really paying the money to stormy daniels to have her remain quiet about an extramarital affair, then you characterize that payment on your books and records as a legal retainer for mr. cohen, those are false business
called john edwards. yes, he was indicted. it was a different situation, but it was using campaign money in a way that was improper to cover a situation and handle a situation of an extramarital affair so before people start rallying around this, democrats didn t do that with john edwards, who had been a vice presidential candidate. right. much different circumstances. but i think that this may be, according to legal experts, which i couldn t question well, john edwards was flying high and doing great his political career and, legally, everything came to a screeching halt. exactly. when that came out. exactly. for trump, they just keep turning away, fellow republicans. they seem to think that he ll somehow get around every legal challenge against him. rather than maybe he will. rather than asking, should we get around right. even if this is deemed the
affair she claims to have had with trump back in 2006. trump denies having an affair with daniels or any wrongdoing although, we are told law enforcement s plans are precau precautionary. trump claimed over the weekend he d be arrested on tuesday. in that same post, he called for protests to, quote, take back our nation, take our nation back today, a one-time legal adviser to one time trump attorney m costello will testify. michael cohen said he was asked to make himself available as a rebuttal witness to costello s testimony. cohen denied costello ever represented him. joe, is that a delay tactic or who knows? i mean, we don t know
office because they said they had trump dead to center on charges, and bragg was too afraid to go after trump that happened before that clown even got to run whatever committee he is running right now. and rick scott saying, oh, well, you re going after trump but not biden, what does that even mean? the feds are investigating hunter biden we ll see what happens when it happens. again, this is all just more smoke. all smoke and mirrors. they want to do anything again, this party will do anything to degrade themselves and lower themselves to defend a failed reality tv star who has destroyed their party and destroyed their hopes of winning national elections. yeah, there is a federal investigation into hunter biden, joe. that s exactly right