paige, if you get this, please, please call somebody everybody s worried about you. everybody s looking for you. please let us know you re ok paige was a woman with premonition. she said she knew something bad was gonna happen a couple of days she, wa missing. we found out she had this second life. quite obviously it dangerous. she had been playing a risk game that opened up the door t the a multitude of people that we needed to start looking at. he was a scam artist. correct he was a liar, manipulative he had a list of names, and whether or not they would have sex with them. could investigators get their man before he struck again? i turned around and he wa sitting in the dark. and sai i m doing to kill you. it s been years since she vanished but few have forgotte paige, how could they, the story of the young mother disappearance has woven itself in to local lore, as thunder hits, finally a trial. it s a mystery we ve been followin
corroborate what the witness was saying. this was piecing together a time line of wher he was, where we could prove h was during the relevant window of opportunity - right that evening or next day when paige went missing. b interviewing lots of people wh had been with coralluzzo or ha talked to him, we were able to painstakingly essentially alib him. hautzinger finally felt the had enough to take the case to a jury. in november 2014, 7 1/ years after paige vanished police arrested lester ralph jones for her murder. but di they know the whole story now? oh, no, they certainly did not they didn t know where or even how paige was killed it would have been nice t have that additional piece o evidence or additional puzzl piece to put into the jigsaw it would help you tell th story too.
ainsley: all 30 hours? pete: you think the rhetoric is hot already we played some of these clips. it s going to get hotter. brian: deborah ramirez team is not happy. they feel as though the fbi did not follow the leads they wanted to on the ramirez team. ramirez is the yale student featured in the new yorker article in the story that wasn t good enough for the new york times because it couldn t be corroborated. they now said i gave the fbi 20 names to follow up on. they only followed up with two. the ford team is not happy because they wanted to the turn over notes and wanted additional information. and wanted to further explain why no one could corroborate their story. she goes no one could because they didn t tell nibble. she did tell leland, who is the golfer, who doesn t have emotional problems. she had physical problems. who can t corroborate the story, period. both those sides feel as though they were short-changed by the fbi and so does every democrat. brian: fb democrat.brian
with armed martials who are willing to cooperate. and they have interviewed witnesses without even notifying the minority party. and when those witness interviews didn t corroborate, the conspiracy theories, they didn t tell us we had to learn about those interviews ourselves. so let me make sure i understand that. the committee has interviewed witnesses without notifying democrats on the committee that those interviews were going to happen? absolutely. they have interviewed several witnesses. they didn t tell us they were going to interview them, didn t invite us to participate and listen to the interviews. when we found out the interviews took place and talked to the witnesses, we learned they didn t corroborate any of the conspiracy theories the republicans have been trying to advance. how could that be? that s not maybe i m wrong here that s not the way the committees work. there is an agenda that is circulated to the entire committee. there is a list of witnesses. ther
let me make sure i understand that. the committee has interviewed witnesses without notifying democrats on the committee that those interviews were going to happen? absolutely. they have interviewed several witnesses. they didn t tell us they were going to interview them, didn t invite us to participate and listen to the interviews. when we found out the interviews took place and talked to the witnesses, we learned they didn t corroborate any of the conspiracy theories the republicans have been trying to advance. how could that be? that s not maybe i m wrong here that s not the way the committees work. there is an agenda that is circulated to the entire committee. there is a list of witnesses. there is a procedure that the committee has all read in on. they just ignored it. to give you another example, when they subpoenaed a witness and this is a chairman who said he won t leak transcripts, won t leak interviews, after almost all of the interviews there have been profound l