to have a decision by the end of june, that they couldn t change the census after that. they said this came solely from the commerce secretary wilbur ross and the white house didn t have any role in trying tuo insert the question in the census. it will be tough for the government to come up with a legitimate, nonpretextual reason. if justice roberts the swing vote holds firm and doesn t change his vote and the court continues to tell the government it can t add the question to the census there is a head-to-head constitutional crisis. joyce, thanks for joining us, joyce vance a former u.s. attorney and msnbc contributor. 2,000 families. a big number. that s who could be targeted this very weekend in a planned crackdown on undocumented immigration. two senior department of homeland security officials tell msnbc news that nationwide immigration raids that were postponed three weeks ago are now scheduled to kick off on sunday. the raids are expected to be carried out by immigration a
cooperate with yet a fifth investigation. private americans, they are legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power plain and simple. i would urge these people, you ve already testified, you can t add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into a perjury trap. maybe the fifth amendment should be considered. keep in mind, the house judiciary committee is supposed to perform oversight of the department of justice. so where is their investigation into the fisa abuse? what about their investigation into political bias in the mueller probe? is their investigation into a list of government spying, using the powerful tools of intelligence against the american people, especially at the height of an election favoring one candidate over anoth
private americans, their legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power, plain and simple.t i would urge these people, you ve already testified, you can t add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into a perjury trap. maybe the fifth amendment should be considered. keep in mind, the house judiciary committee is supposed to perform oversight of the department of justice. so where is their investigation into the fisa abuse? what about their investigation into political bias in the mueller probe? is there an investigation into a list of government spying, usins the powerful tools of intelligence against the american people, especially at the height of an election favoring one candidate over another? did they even care if high-ranking b
nickname for. she s the one watching her on that stage, it was so terribly obvious she could go toe to toe with him in a debate and i think it got to him she would be a threat so i think we ll see this attempt to undercut him as much as possible. should kamala harris scare donald trump? what i saw is that she s very skilled at being aggressive and also being likeable. when is a tough line to walk and she saw where she could take shots and took them and that is a skill that does work well against trump but when it came to the policy she got tripped up on the health care question because she s sponsored something that eliminates all of private health insurance and she i wassed her hand about it hold on. it wasn t accurate. she said supplemental but they wouldn t add she s sponsored multiple bills. but she raised her hand and then had to backtrack and said that is not what i said. i misheard the question. and this is the second time on this specific issue she s done
that stage, it was so terribly obvious she could go toe to toe with him in a debate and i think it got to him she would be a threat so i think we ll see this attempt to undercut him as much as possible. should kamala harris scare donald trump? what i saw is that she s very skilled at being aggressive and also being likeable. when is a tough line to walk and she saw where she could take shots and took them and that is a skill that does work well against trump but when it came to the policy she got tripped up on the health care question because she s sponsored something that eliminates all of private health insurance and she raised her hand about it hold on. it wasn t accurate. she said supplemental but they wouldn t add she s a co-sponsor of multiple bills, but go ahead. the point is she raised her hand on it and then had to backtrack and said that is not what i said. i misheard the question. and this is the second time on this specific issue she s done it so to cl