A hello, and welcome to this special edition of conflict zone on the crisis in hong kong. Over the last year, weve interviewed several probate janan prodemocracy figures, and we challenge them all to justify what theyve done and said some of their arguments have clearly failed to stand the test of time. Nathan law, a leading prodemocracy activist, fled to london in june after a warrant was issued for his arrest. This week i asked him if youd ever believed his movement could take on beijing and when i think we have already achieved a lot of things where demonstrate the courage and bravery of hong kong people and making sure the well knows that well received thing and collaborating in combating the authoritarian expansion of china. So i think we have awakened the world, but the result isnt in doubt, is it . China will get its way. Beijing will get its way, wont it . While beijing has been suppressing hong kong people at the cost of our basic freedom. And as a matter of fact, the world ha
Condemned around the world so i wanted to have the answers she gave us. Refute that youre welcome to a conference on hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long not consist mainly up principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels like is true and that a hong kong version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going ahead to an actor in
Protests joining me this week from hong kong is regina its a member of the citys Legislative Council and chair of the probe aging new Peoples Party will the communist authorities try to use this law as they have with other security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. Did you not youre welcome to a conference on. Hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obli
Security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. That youre welcome to a conference on how low you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that china is going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law onto because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long what consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it fills or pla is true and that a hong kong version reflects its understanding that hong kong to russia which is consistent with our common law system thats why painting is going a hack to
A member of the citys Legislative Council and chair of the probe aging new Peoples Party will the communist authorities try to use this law as they have with other security statutes on the mainland to violate basic rights and restrict free expression. That youre welcome to a conference on hello you recently wrote an article about the controversial new security law that chinas going to impose on hong kong and you said this does not to necessarily spell the death of hong kong separate systems but youre taking a huge gamble backing this law arent you because beijing has done everything it can to prove that its not interested in those separate systems not interested in freedom of expression human rights or the rule of law is it. I dont think we need to come to a conclusion because china already has its own National Security law you know which is only a few pages long whats consists mainly of principles exhortations duties obligations. I think the fact that it needs it feels or pla is true