public. i mean nixon tried this. it didn t work out so well for him. and i suspect the supreme court result would have the same result as they did back in 1974. ultimately, the genius of our system transparency and checks and balances, and hiding information about presidential wrongdoing, it s not going to work. you said it would be the end of the administration. when i ask you what do you mean by that, because during his confirmation hearing, william brrr said of the report that his, quote, goal will be to provide as much transparency as i can consistent with the law. based on what pamela and evan are reporting, does it sound like b.a.r.t intends to live up to that goal? well, i sure hope and i didn t take their reports to be sourced to barr or something like that. i think barr sounded a note of disclosure in his confirmation hearing. i m sure the trump administration white house officials would like to take some of that back. but that is what barr said. and when you read that lan
of law. there is even a provision we wrote in there to make sure the attorney general can make the reports public. so that s number one. number two is that the president himself, his lawyers have been saying that he can t be indicted because he s a sitting president. and every scholar who takes that view also says to make sure a president is not above the law, the remedy is impeachment. that congress has to be able to do its function. and the only way of course for that to happen is for them to have all the information. so whether or not it s in the bar report or not, congress will just subpoena it, and they will get it no matter. and then number three is the public. i mean nixon tried this. it didn t work out so well for him. and i suspect the supreme court result would have the same result as they did back in 1974. ultimately, the genius of our system transparency and checks and balances, and hiding information about presidential wrongdoing, it s not going to work. you said it woul