ju julie banderas , dr. janet nesheiwat and ian prior. we begin with shannon bream, who is live at the supreme court. shannon. shannon: kayleigh, we had talked about student loans and issue was standing, state of missouri had standing to bring this legal challenge and secretary of education went too far using the heroes act to wipe out student loans. the 6-3 opinion, the heroes act gives authority to cancel money for student loans, it does not. the secretary can modify regulatory provision, with the education acts, not to rewrite the statute from the ground up, which is essentially what he did to wipe out the loans. the judge wrote this, the statute read gives secretary broad authority to remove national emergency effect on ability to repay student loan. that 6-3 split did not see this the same way. this affects billions in student loans. the president and other democrats suggested, i don t think he had authority to do this and supreme court agreed. lori smiths, free speech
directly blaming new york governor kathy hochul saying that she failed and there is a lot more to this horrifying tragedy. david lee millers is live in the newsroom. good morning, david lee. this deadly saga began in late september. as you point out 30-year-old woman posted a video online that shows her being beaten by her husband near buffalo. after viewing the video he was charged. the charges did not give a judge discretion to require bail under new york law. he was also served and order of protection. a day after being released he shot and killed his wife after forcing her car off the road as she was driving her three young children to school. he is now behind bars and pleaded not guilty to murder and three counts of endangering the welfare of a child. he had a violent past serving 15 years for adementing to kidnap an exgirlfriend. new york law does not allow the judge to take into consideration whether a defendant is a danger to the community. her mother says cashless
emily: maybe he s not qualified. we have a system set up, the point is it should be equipped and ready, prepared for any type of inclement weather. it should be able to absorb things we can t control or predict. them blaming the weather underscores uninefficiency. weather happens all the time, build in efficiencies. kayleigh: imagine you are ian or julie sleeping with your kids in the airport. or on your kid or someone sleeping on the floor and looking for information. looking at united and american and you go to faa twitter feed and they have clever quip about wheel of fortune, and they cc
speech, might be a better definition, to twitter? i hope so. i mean, for all of our sakes, i hope so. there s a lot of resistance. he s facing pressuring from advertisers, facing pressure from activist groups. they have this system set up, this power, empowered activists by giving them a sword and shield, right? they can strike down anything as misinformation or hate speech that they want. ethic smear you all they want. they have a shield on the other side. that s their sword. they have a shield on the other side, where you can t criticize them or you get banned. musk has threatened to take away that shield. they will fight to the death to prevent him from doing that. he s got a tough battle ahead of him. tucker: i think you re absolutely right. i don t think you re overstating it. i think the word existential, but that is this for them. did you understand how important censorship was for the people currently in charge to keep their power? i mean, they seem to think it s the most
unconstitutional. i want to stress i m not against bail reform. there is a system set up in new jersey that i would love to talk to our legislators about using it here. they reduce their jail population by 44% and saw no increase in violent crime. the problem with this law. they defend by saying there is no such thing as a non-detainable crime. that s ludicrous when you look at this law. if you do look at the detention, what do they mean? they make it sound like the person will be detained in jail until the trial. that s false. it is only for 90 days. if i don t get the individual to trial in 90 days, they walk out of the jail. and the language in the statute says they shall not be detained after 90 days and there is no provision for any additional jail time. if someone is charged with ten homicides, that s not something i could get to trial in 90 days. they ll get out. and then if they don t show up for court, i can t get a