Start with robert costa from the Washington Post, the paper that published the story. What did you learn in the story . We all learned a lot from this story. The Washington Post, high colleagues here in the newsroom, have been reporting on judge moore and his relationship with the people who are under age and also over 18, but alarms reporting, people going on the record, women going on the record about their experiences with judge moore when he was 32 years old, and a prominent lawyer in the community. One of the things that come the out here is that roy moore, this was all happening about 34 years ago. Roy moore has come out and said that he denies all the allegations. I guess in the process of the Washington Post, going to roy moore for comment that must be how he got this information to breitbart, which put out an article before the story came out . That is true. Breitbart actually said in their story that the Roy Moore Campaign through some person provided the information to the W
Doorashada Itoobiya maxaa laga filan karaa? bbc.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from bbc.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
these were e-mails from the dnc, and john podesta. that s the argument they re making. that the russians were aggressively trying to help trump, because all of the damaging e-mails were damaging to the democrats. not the first to make that argument. folks like adam schiff, symbol committee. you d have to be willfully blind nod to think the hack was intended to harm democrats because only the democrats had this information revealed. that s a judgment to make. i mean, there are so many blurring of the lines here for political purposes. we have to break through it a bit. what no one is disputing, intelligence community, the 16 agencies of the intelligence community and fbi, is that russia hacke hacked the election. right? with confidence, they don t go out with public statements using the term confidence, an intelligence term, unless they have the goods to back that up.