he and ted cruz were getting along swimmingly, ted looked like a threat, and all of a sudden and ugly heidi which was definitely the highlight of his disgustingness during that campaign. i think he feels like beto is a real challenge? i m not sure, but he recognizes his celebrity. he s on the cover of vanity fair, he was running a statewide election that had donors from, i think, all 50 states he ended up neil: wasn t that more content for ted cruz? there were definitely a few viral videos of beto when he was defending the right, talking about immigration, el paso skateboards, water burger, all of it. neil: dental hygienist. i think that one backfired. the person who doesn t have a nickname is nancy pelosi, and he definitely sees her as a threat. he will not go there with her neil: yet.
time now, lots of home grown crises. the president campaign chairman is about find out how long he ll spend in federal prison. you ve been telling americans to basically be aware about what s going on in venezuela, about what our own government appears to be doing there now. what is your concern? what do you think people should be watching for? there s been plenty of reporting going back at least a year about president trump s inquiries about military intervention in venezuela. it s curious because the president seems to get along swimmingly with other brutal dictators around the world, but for whatever reason he has pegged nicolas maduro about someone he will get along differently with. he calls this a new free and fair election, but there is no pathway to maduro to usher in a new regime. it runs through u.s. military intervention. the u.s. has cooled its talk of military intervention generally over the last week, but there is no doubt that president trump has had a lot of interest
president seems to get along swimmingly with other brutal dictators around the world, but for whatever reason he has pegged nicolas maduro about someone he will get along differently with. he calls this a new free and fair election, but there is no pathway to maduro to usher in a new regime. it runs through u.s. military intervention. the u.s. has cooled its talk of military intervention generally over the last week, but there is no doubt that president trump has had a lot of interest in that kind of move in venezuela, and i think it s just important for all of us to make sure that we are not setting ourselves up for a giant mistake there. when we pull our diplomats out today, i will note that one of the reasons we said was because it was constraining our options in venezuela. some people read that to mean that with our diplomats there,
it has been helpful to fox news about it has not generated better press for this president. it is remarkable. when you think about the lack of white house briefings. how can it be that just now, people in the white house are waking up to the fact that there is this symbolic relationship with fox news and a lot of hires from fox news to the white house. not just in communications positions. in staffing positions. you know, i think they ve gotten so used the this simbiotic relationship. they can feel like everything is going swimmingly. when there are officials who look outside the window and you know, look at the real world, they understand that things have not been going well. when the president s personal stoern up on capitol hill testifying, accusing the president of committing crime. the jobs numbers come out today and showing only 20,000 jobs created in the last month. you look at various data points
director. he s allowed to fire pretty much whomever he wishes. it had no effect on the russia investigation. the russia investigation has expanded into all kinds of areas. the president hasn t interfered with their funding. as a matter of fact, mr. mccabe testified under oath before congress that everything s going along swimmingly, that they ve gotten the funds that they need. there s no evidence of obstruction per se. the president has the inherent power to hire and fire pretty much as he wishes. this seemed to me to be a pretext. what do you think? i don t know if it was a pretext or or just an abysmal misunderstanding of our constitutional order and the power of the president. we do not have an imperial presidency. there are many checks and there are many balances. especially the united states congress, especially the house of representatives. if something has gone a awry, the founding generation said we want that judgment as to whether to put the impeachment process