connections playing out, that s sort of starts to raise the suspicion level. but it does also raise the question of whether or not law enforcement is too quick to come out and label something as domestic terrorism. remember, in the charleston shooting case there was a whole issue there about whether it was terrorism, whether it was not when it clearly seemed to be an act of terrorism by the act itself. you get into a little bit of politics i think of these situations here when you start choosing whether to put the label on it. but it does seem they at least in this case had a couple of indicators early on saying this is looking like pattern that we normally associate with something that we would definitely call terrorism. isis inspired or directed that s still an open question. yeah. hey, lathe, it s krystal ball here in phoenix. i was wonder quhag you made of the at least travel details that pete williams laying out that abdulazeez had two passports and made it hard to track exactly
cannot get blood from a stone, and the stone being hillary clinton s server in this instance, would you general electric, would you release the documents? would you release the communications that you have with the state department during this time to prove to us investors here that nothing untoward happened? and that s the approach that we are coming from. we are a good governance organization. we are concerned that general electric may have exposed itself here to honest services fraud completely unnecessarily. right. and so you did this in the shareholder meeting. stand up and raise your hand and immelt was on the stage. what was the response? his exact words were what i ask are you going to release the documents? he said that s not something we would do. so that raises the suspicion level even higher, doesn t it right? if there is no there there why won t g.e. get out in front of this story rather than playing from defensive from behind if i m the ceo.
suspicion level gets to a point where you have an opportunity to protect others then in fact that s where confidentiality has to end. okay? so we actually have a responsibility if we feel that we can protect others or warn other ifs a threat has been made. dave the more we learn about what the co-pilot s doctors knew it makes new reporting or screening requirements seem that much more necessary. do you think we re going to see changes to medical screening, particularly the mental health portion because of this? i think that it will first go more towards environmental screening. for example, being able to report again, whether you ve had a break-up or a divorce or a move. but again, that still relies a lot on the pilot s self-reporting. so that has to be examined really closely. i don t know what the answer is. i don t think anybody does. but we certainly all agree there has to be something done in the industry right now. i think you re right. justin part of the
presumably as they were expected to act and required but it still seems like there were so many missed opportunities to stop this. do you agree with that? well, i mean, i think if your suspicion level gets to a point where you have an opportunity to protect others, then in fact, that s where confidentiality has to end. okay? so we actually have a responsibility if we feel that we can protect others or warn other ifs a threat has been made. dave, the more we learn about what the co-pilot s doctors knew, it makes new reporting or screening requirements seem that much more necessary. do you think we re going to see changes to medical screening, particularly, the mental health portion because of this? i think that it will first go more towards environmental screening. for example, being able to report, again, whether you ve had a break-up or a divorce or a move. but again, that still relies a lot on the pilot s self-reporting.
remote field that we don t even know of in the jungle. well, all of it is a possibility. we know the transponder was working and it got turned off. that raises my suspicion level. then it was so off course according to the reports, if they turn out to be true. i agree with your admonition, dr. mcgee, we don t want to jump to conclusions but pilots have to turn off the transponder. the fact that nobody was able to track them it was 90 minutes before they realized the plane was missing from chinese air space, that is somewhat disconcer disconcerting to me. somebody is always monitoring your progress, right? absolutely, and more importantly, sean, what you re raising the larger question in systems thinking here. we need good reliable information and data to come in so we can have some reliable knowledge and understanding about aviation safety and security on an international scale. and as long as we leave these