says something that s wrong and rebut him. but then wrist wray would be doing nothing else in his job other han rebutting the president. the law is clear. the director of the fbi was clear when he testified before congress about the law. the men and women in law enforcement and the intelligence community know what s required. rick stengel explained to us that people who work in serious campaigns know what s required. i m not sure i would tell chris wray that he needed to say something else. he was perfectly clear. chuck, what about the attorney general. right. so the attorney general is in a different and more political position. i would hope at the very least, to frank s point that the attorney general would sit down with the president and say mr. president, if this is your understanding of the law, then your understanding is flat out wrong. i don t know that heal. but somebody ought to advise the president because if others are taking advice from the president on had point, they
i love it, let s meet. if a foreign intelligence service does, yes. what if a foreign national does as the law provides. what if something other than a foreign intelligence service says it. we have reasons to expect william barr will try to fashion some kind of new answers that protects what donald trump said today. we ll surely hear more about that tomorrow possibly from william barr. that was a hearing about the justice department budget shortly after the mueller report came up. we ll be right back. we ll be right back. turning 50 opens the door to a lot of new things. like now your doctor may be talking to you about screening for colon cancer. luckily there s me, cologuard. the noninvasive test you use at home. it all starts when your doctor orders me. then it s as easy as get, go, gone. you get me when i m delivered. right to your front door and in the privacy of your own home.
congress must now tell us how many times they have done this. that would be good to know. he doesn t seem to understand the law is meant to restrain some impulses we have. he would do anything. he would talk to the devil in order to defeat his opponent which also wouldn t be legal. he didn t even call the fbi when he fired the head of the fbi. chuck, the one time he called the fbi is when he wanted the fbi to go easy on mike flynn. yeah, you know, i recall that. the other thing i recall the president saying which is also a really odd hinge for a president to say, remember when he said he s been around flippers his entire life he knows flippers and what they re like referring to cooperating witnesses with that slang term. who is around flippers? back to frank s point? people around flippers their entire life, people who never call the fbi tending to criminals. that s who they hang out with and that s their surrency. so it s really not all that
will violate the law in the future, we vote to remove him from office. there s some version of an article of impeachment here that actually has a future tense in it and i don t think we ve ever seen that before. lawrence, he think that s right. of course, we need an impeachment inquiry to perhaps narrow it down a bit because when you look at all the criminal wrongdoing that is an apparent here, it would be encycloped dick impeachment document. we need to inquire carefully. we begin with the presumption of innocence but there is so much to suggest that high crimes and misdemeanors have been committed here and that it is our responsibility to act and act promptly instead of copying to delay and delay. that s the trump game is to delay and delay. and we need to not be aiding and abetting it. chuck lossen berg, this is one of those examples of what could have been in the robert
i d want to hear it, meaning he would want to hear exactly what the foreign national or foreign government was fwael actually illegally offering him. here s what federal law says about this. it says, it shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly to, make a contribution or donation of money or, this is the important part, other thick of value, or to making an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a federal, state, or local. that law also says it shall be unlawful for a person to solicit, and here s the president s role in this, accept, that word accept, solicit or accept or receive a contribution or donation from a foreign national. the president said he would accept it. the law does regard opposition research as a thing of value.