galveston river. think in the trial of susan berman s death there will be defense experts talking bit miss psychology well-being. do you think he wanted to say that. i believe he enough what he was saying and there what irthere were cockroaches in the bathroom. i got him, i got him, killed them all. some savvy defense attorney will try their best to get that excluded. if not excluded explained away. all the other stuff. sure. that envelope is the killer for him no pun intended. they ve all doing the documentary. i don t know any good lawyer who would allow their client or doing a documentary is every good idea. doesn t end well. no. thank you both very much. in the meantime issue did turkey stop being a turkey? signs the middle east supposed holdout on isis might finally be telling the beside guy bad guys to stuff it.
what the mics aren t in the business don t know. someone who is bright enough to be part of the hbo series this is someone who has tremendous wealth obviously had a very rich upbringing, had lots of education. they a milk on you think expectation is you know that could be live. even in the bathroom. absolutely. i don t disagree with that point. i think mercedes is right. he didn t have an expectation of privacy but i m not sure that is the crucial issue here. the crucial issue i think if i were the prosecutor is how do i use that statement to prove that he was talking about the murders at issue that this is in fact relevant or material to the death of susanber man. will the judge allow this? i think probably but it will by difficult to convince a jury he is guilty giant if you take a step back those are great points. take a step back and asked what
prompted him to say that. he was cronet fronted with the letter that showed that the author misspelled beverly. the same block letters, the same style. exactly. he says where they could find the boy odd susan berman and only the person who knew she was murdered, knew where the boy they mentioned on mic or off mic, just are so or sealed that. absolutely. would you use it if your presenting him? work until the rickens to get it out. that this subject of great litigation in the case in california. i do think that a judge will let it in. however i think that this is one of those cases where law enforcement has come outs said there is new evidence which justifies the imposition of the charges. did they arrest him bailed on this admission? they claim it was not seem very for fortuitous. with we learn the authority