stop selling political advertising in 2020. focus on the former vice president and son, saying their they re following in twitter s family accounted corruptly in footsteps. ukraine. cnbc reports, quote, unlike the president has been on a twitter and facebook, spotify twitter tear during the holiday refrained from offering its week all about that, and perspective on political appearing to turn much of his advertising. only saying that the decision is the result of the music ire on house speaker nancy streaming company not having pelosi. joining us now on more on all of sufficient tools to vet the ads. this, nbc news correspondent the wall street journal says hans nichols who is with the this decision will, quote, cut off what was already a narrow president in palm beach where the president has been on channel for major political campaigns, noting 2020 vacation for the holidays, but he is not holiday-ing when it candidates, senator elizabeth comes to social media, hans. warren, mayor p
i almost got that right. susan, let s start with you. clearly just by the numbers, we re way off here if those estimates by the brendan center are right. it s good to see in key states that i just brought up some examples that they re doing something. but i ll ask you, is it enough? no. i mean, you know, all the experts are saying it requires billions. the $420 or that they allocated is certainly better than the zero that they al indicated for this year. but clearly there needs to be a much more extensive effort, particularly what we know about russian interference in the 2016 campaign. and the other side of this that we keep for getting as we talk about the impeachment and the mueller report is in a way putin has already won. what he wanted was to undermine american faith in our democracy and trump winning was kind of a bonus for him. but all of these things are undermining people s faith in elections and what happens when they go to the ballot box. we get more information as
glad i stopped cleaning and started swiffering. a big part of this here, susan, and please do reflect on what daniel was saying, is the doctor s office might mejust for a shot.o timing, right? but why go back there as we move into the primaries, when you can stay home as leader pelosi makes that with neulasta® onpro? strong chemo can put you decision, come monday she did at risk of serious infection. in a key study not hand over those articles as neulasta® reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1% was expected here, when will they do that, will she do it, a 94% decrease. neulasta® onpro is designed to and what might be the levers, deliver neulasta® the day after chemo what might be the contingencies that she is looking for before and is used by most patients today. she does that? neulasta® is for certain cancer patients receiving it s interesting, this is like a little bit of payback on strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta® if you re allergic to it the part of the spe
time last quarter? that s right. she is significantly behind where she was in the third quarter. she sent out another plea today. interesting the way she framed it, referring to her 2012 senate race when she was of course an underdog against scott brown and she tried to paint the picture as an underdog again today, telling voters that she needs to raise another couple of million dollars to reach their goal of $20 million for the end of the quarter. interesting to see what s going on. she s had a few stumbles with her health care policies and potentially some of the progressive base feeling weary how she s trying to walk back her support for medicare for all. i wanted to talk about the question i was discussing with susan, as well as daniel, and that s on whether or not the president should allow aides to give testimony, and how that might affect the president s opinion here, hans, because the numbers are quite high when you look at the republicans answering the this poll. 64%, two-
adjourn the start of a trial until november 4th, 2020. that would allow the american people to decide the president s fate at the ballot box. what do you think, susan? well, it would be helpful in some ways in that the president would not have this hanging over him during a re-election campaign. certainly nobody would want to go through that. on the other hand, as i said, it does deprive him of the ability to come out and say, look, i was impeached by those partisan, awful democrats, but they found me not guilty in the senate. and it does deprive him of that. but certainly it might remove it as a distraction during the campaign for him. let s get over to you on this, simone, right now. fundraising, i want to move to that as we look at 2020, and they re all looking to close the quarter quite nicely. but elizabeth warren not looking so nice. describe that very quickly, she has a little over 17 million. it s a good chunk that s behind where she was at at the same