line stances that they re taking on the far right of the party, so how do you go to congress if you re unwilling to compromise? is this why you need a bigger majority? reporter: exactly. this is 5% of house republicans. 5%, katy, that held up the bill, held up the floor last week and shut it down. and 5% of republicans that have said we want a new deal with kevin mccarthy, not the deal that we made in january, but rather a new governing agreement. this is just paralysis and frankly, it s not logical to the n degree, and by the way, it s not only government funding. we wrote this last week or this week, they all meld together at this point. the faa needs to be reauthorized, the farm bill, which is a hugely important bill, deals with s.n.a.p. and all sort of other issues. fisa, the nation s surveillance laws. pandemic preparedness authority, all of these policies, except
DPC, Meta Ireland did not adequately protect EU personal data during cross-border data transfers and fined 1.2 billion euros . Majority of businesses, relied upon the GDPR-approved standard contractual clauses to provide the legal basis for international data transfers.
a president so of course he can stage a coup, i don t think that goes very far that doesn t fly with most juries. but you can imagine if getting one juror reset well, he was a president and he had this authority on the 19th. then, the save argument he forgot or did not use it. but he had in of the 19th, is it with the crime the kicker out of office jail on the 21st? i wouldn t call that a strictly legal argument but wouldn t call it the will make that to jurors i ve seen that technically a legal defense. but they may say we give this war hero break. we a lot on the timeline we have to work out there. cnn is also reporting today that prosecutors are investigating a flood. this sounds very shady to me, at mar-a-lago last year that an active room with containing surveillance laws were kept.
you mean by that, caitlin? sure a lot of the concerns about tiktok or that the chinese government because of chinese surveillance laws can broadly access personal information that s either stored or transferred within borders. now if the united states either bans tiktok or forces tiktok the cell to a us company, this isn t going to affect just tiktok. this could potentially affect any chinese or even any non us company that wishes to operate in the united states. in 2023, every company operates a website. every company collects data. so every company is a tech company. but it could also affect us companies as well that wish to operate abroad. there are a lot of countries that have concerns about the lack of data privacy laws in the united states. there are a lot of countries have concerns about u. s government surveillance, too. so if the united states takes this very unprecedented move to either tiktok, or force it to divest, this could have longer term ramifications for the global ec