important interpretations so we don t have secret law. americans know what the surveillance law means. they said on one hand, we don t need this because we promised to do this and on the other hand, we can t do it because it is dangerous to national security. it is an incoherent position. when they get in power suddenly executive power lookings better to them. no one wants to throw it away. julian sanchez from the cato research society. thank you for joining me, my friend. good to see you. if for those who are frustrated because the show doesn t do more stories about frustrated norwegian kickers, the story is straight ahead. yo, give it up, dude! up high! ok. don t you have any usefull apps on that thing? who do you think i am, quicken loans? at quicken loans,
get fisa right became the largest supporter group on mybarackobama.com, forced to release a video, and say i recognize it s a small bill, instead of not letting them have a tool they need, i will support this, it s flawed, and i ll do a review later and see what kind of additional civil liberty protections might be needed. but yet his administration has fought every possible proposal, often in incoherent terms. that would for example, senator merkley wanted to require the fisa court or at least the justice department to release redacted opinions of important interpretations so we don t have secret law. americans would know what the surveillance law means. they said, no, no, no. we don t need this, we already
because his own supporters were upset about this, a group called get fisa right became the largest supporter group on mybarackobama.com, forced to release a video, and say i recognize it s a small bill, instead of not letting them have a tool they need, it s flawed, i ll do a review later and see what kind of additional civil liberty selections might be need needed. but yet he s fought every possible proposal, often in incoherent terms that for example, senator americaly wanted to require the fisa court or at least the justice department to release redacted opinions of important interpretations so we don t have secret law. americans would know what the surveillance law means. they said, no, no, no. we don t need this, we already