the federal courts are old-fashioned. even though these are public proceedings, it s not easy for the public to get access. the judge will hear the arguments from both sides and then this could go several ways. sometimes judges hearing arguments and says, thank you, i ll be issuing my order soon. that could be later today, tomorrow, next week. it s up to the judge. or the judge may give a full ruling from the bench and then our reporter will come running out and tell us what it is. sometimes judges give partway rulings. the judge may say, i am or am not going to grant the special master and my full reasoning will follow soon. so, it s going to be one of those three scenarios. probably sometime fairly soon. should we expect new arguments beyond what was filed by the doj and the trump team? i don t think we re going to see new arguments that we ve not heard before. you re supposed to limit your argument in court to what you have already put in your brief. you re not supposed to have
this is what is at stake. why did donald trump do? this but as you all know. that s not just what s at stake. that s just as it relates to our national security. but there s also this piece about what it means for america s role on the world stage. as countries are watching this unfold, is the damage that has been done irrevocable? nothing is ever irrevocable. i think. but, what s criminally intelligence service would cooperate with us today. in the same way that they might have ten or 20 years ago? when they didn t have to worry about an ex president of the united states, of all things, jeopardizing national secrets. as you know, alicia, we have great intentional gents services in the united states. but part of the reason that we are so prepared against surprise attacks, terrorist attacks, other dangerous in the modern world, is we have governments with great intelligence services with whom we share information. if they close up their briefcases, we are going to be living in a mu
intelligence service would cooperate with us today. in the same way that they might have ten or 20 years ago? when they didn t have to worry about an ex president of the united states, of all things, jeopardizing national secrets. as you know, alicia, we have great intentional gents services in the united states. but part of the reason that we are so prepared against surprise attacks, terrorist attacks, other dangerous in the modern world, is we have governments with great intelligence services with whom we share information. if they close up their briefcases, we are going to be living in a much more insecure state of the children of our families and they will be jeopardized. and i owe that to the defeat of donald trump. but you asked if americans would ever get a confession, a apology for any of this intimate to go out on a limb and say that you are probably not holding your breath on that for trump, but what about other