Original is on that is sometimes good. It is not the idea that you lose history and constitutional interpretation. But original is on is the claim that the only legitimate way to read the constitution is what people in 1787 that wrote the document were people that ratified it thereafter thought what the constitution meant and that no other meetings are acceptable. And so i think for that the people the sense of how difficult it was even at the moment for people to understand what the constitution was, and at that moment, will be a little bit complicated. Coming back to my original question about madison who oftentimes thought he was bowed father of politicians. If you look at what he did in terms of trying to change them a little bit to reflect his evolving views, is it fair to think of them . Is the father of the constitution . The thing i came away from his how important this is. Not the objective record but as a way for us to understand how difficult it was that they faced. I came a
backstage area. pete buttigieg approached to greet the most powerful democrat in south carolina politics. clyburn brushed mayor pete assign and his eyes darted around and foundgn biden and he together out of earshot of the other candidates and there wasn t much time until bid-to be back on stage, you ve had a couple of opportunities to mention naming a black woman to the suprememe court. clyburn lectured his friend of nearly half acl century like a schoolteacher scolding a child. i m telling you, don t leave the stage without making it known. and biden had seemed to get it night before, when clyburn talked to him at a congressional black caucus reception aboard the uss yorktown. biden was desperateth to get clyburn s endorsement. very few endorsements carry weight in modern f politics. in south carolina though, awe perception that built up that clyburn s im prime tour meant everything. and and voters believed it and the media believed it and most