these state maps were drawn, they say they diluted the voting strength of african-americans, as well as latinos, they say the way the maps were drawn just weren t equitable, but, poppy, today, the supreme court upholding three of four of those districts and yet another gerrymandering case, a lot of them have been here at the court, some partisan gerrymandering. today dealing with the issue of supreme court upholding most of the issues in texas. jessica schneider, thank you. we appreciate it. what is happening in america? civility out, shaming and shunning in. on the same weekend white house press secretary sarah sanders is asked to leave a restaurant, maxine waters says don t let the public shaming stop with sanders. do you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant, in a
more breaking news, the supreme court, let s go straight to jessica schneider. this has to deal with redistricting, voting maps drawn in texas. what did the justices decide? reporter: another gerrymandering case front and center at the supreme court this morning. the supreme court ruling that three out of the four districts in texas, the voting districts that were challenged, three or four of them may stand. these were districts that were challenged by plaintiffs who said that they were intentionally discriminated against when these districts were being drawn. so the supreme court upholding three of four of those districts, but saying that one of the state legislative districts, the way it was drawn, was not in fact proper. so this is a case that really dates back all the way to 2011, these plaintiffs have been fighting it for several years now saying that the way that