to ukraine, including a fresh new infusion of eight hundred i and twenty million dollars just this week, bringing the totalof commitment. are you guys ready toe fifty four billion dollarsyo, which is about a third ofis ukraine s entire gdp. but according to one biden adviser, we all must sacrifice so that the liberal world order is upheld. watch this .e the military analyst, the director of nationalal intelligence, they say that this could be a long war measured s in years. and ian think everybody understands why this is happening. but is it sustainable? what do you say to those families who say, listen, we can tto afford to pay forla eighty five a gallon for months, if not years? s this is just not sustainable. for which heard from the president today was a clear articulation of the stakes. this is about the future of the liberal world order and we . so just how long will you be expected to suffer in silence for the liberal world order? well, according to joe biden,
of you where a really an important area here and we have to act and politicians debating the most personal decisions, not only women, but we ll find it very expensive, expand on this decision. men as well. yeah, i m not totally sure what biden is trying to say, but his fellow democrats in the media mob have been hysterical all week long. watch this . the court is utterly fraudulent and the only thing that can explain their decisions is whati is right wing republican . > the one thing that has been destabilizing is the outrageous behavior of the supreme court of the united states and overruling not only roe v. wade bute essentially challenging the right to privacy. neverng in thehe history of women s rights in america have we seen such a reversal in an developed country. it just hasn t happened. and thee rest of the world is watching this very, very closely. this court has lost legitimacy
i mean, they re supposed to be the covid genius s. and yet this border beyond covid, there s zeca, there s tuberculosis, there s the unknown that viruses are coming over . what while fighting this , t what are the options that you have? what can you tell us ? we ve got to continue to fightht in court. we still have immigration lawsuits. we sav still have this one goin. we ve got to do what we can at the state level. but as you mentioned, some of these cases like us , the arizona i mean, we can t step in and stop the feds fromin can violating federal law from not following federal law. i don t thinkg those cases are right. and i think we going have toon continue to challenge them and hope that we can get some of these overturned because otherwise we re supposedly have to sit c on the border and watch crime occur once the cartels workri cr basically in conjunction with border patrol to get as many people here illegally as possible . and the o consequences of that are not just devastating
standpoint, joe biden wants to create this chronic state of whiplash every time a new party takes over congress and the white house, they would reverse the previous decision on abortion. ab this persistent ping pong effect. p look,er abortion is important. n it shouldn t be treated like a rubber band expanded and contracted. yeah. you know, thank you , greg. and professor dershowitz, d regardless of what we think of the decision, the fact that the president, the united states on foreign soil is complainingde about the supreme court, do you find that troubling? and i find the whole attack on the supreme court s integrityin and the supreme court s justification to be very troubling. you know, i ve been studyingyi the constitution, the supreme court now for 60 years. hr i veou seen it go through cycle. the pendulum swings wildly. i remember in the birch society had signs up impeach earl warrenen, impeach bill douglas
my former colleague laurenceth tribe now says packed the court left the democrats here for then the republicans will or soonourt a supreme court will st in yankee stadium with thirty thousand justices deciding each case. actually , no. nine isne the right number. let s keep the supreme court a as it is and don t tinker with justice. isn t the answer to have i don t know who why the left suddenly wanted theseed unelected lawyers to be making all ofec our decisions. a that isn t the answer tons have congress be involved, to have the statehouses be involved. isn t this the normal i order? it s almost as though they re they re making a reversal out of this effort to protect politicians from having to make decisionsg on these issues. and what s the point of yesterday s supreme courton decision on the epa? em e the supreme court was sayinn essentially read the darn law. i mean, nowhere in the clean air act section 111 does