confidence in our court. and that means we need more justices on the united states supreme court. republican senator lindsey graham on fox news sunday responded to it all. the way you do this is to do what we did. you take it to the ballot box. you don t try to destroy america. while a federal law making abortion legal across america still remains highly unlikely, there are several democrats who are campaigning and fundraising specifically on this issue, which is raising some criticism among members of their own party, specifically congresswoman judy chu in california who has criticized this and said to her colleagues that they should really be focused on getting out the vote, that that is more critical at this hour. bret? bret: aishah hasnie live on capitol hill. thank you. bret: breaking officials in missouri talking about train derailment. train in chicago illinois
the legal team representing the school district a group that advocates for separation of church and state is now warning about where it fears the majority s opinion leads next. opens the door to coercive prayer in k through 12 classrooms across the country. because if the court buys into the myth that when a public official working for a public school, who is praying in a demonstrative manner that pressures kids to join. as for what kennedy is hoping for seven years after this legal fight started? as soon as they the school district said hey, come back, i am there. absolutely. first flight. and the term is not over just yet. we will get opinions again on wednesday morning at 10:00 a.m. eastern time. and the court has not indicated whether or not that s the final day of the term. we are standing by on that front. still outstanding cases one on immigration and one on how far the e.p.a. s power or doesn t reach in a regulatory scheme, bret? bret: this is the never
entity sought to punish an individual for engaging in a brief, quiet personal religious observance. doublely protected by the free exercise and free speech clauses of the first amendment. then the only meaningful justification the government offered for it reprisal rested on a mistake in view that it had a duty to ferret out and suppress religious even as it allows comparable secular speech. the constitution neither mandates nor tolerates that kind of discrimination. the dissent written by justice sotomayor and joined by justices breyer and kagan argues the majority s decision will enforce states to entangle themselves with religion writing today s decision is particularly misguided. because it elevates the religious rights of a school official who voluntarily accepted public employment and the limits that public employment entails over those of his students who are required to attend school and who this court have long recognized are particularly vulnerable and deserving of protection
bret: i understand what you are saying. the attorney general, obviously, has talked about this at length. saying that they instructed u.s. attorneys to pursue any specific credible allegations of substantial fraud and he found none. and including using very colorful language in his testimony. i understand what you are saying, but there have been as you know more than 70 court cases where there was not evidence and there was not any state legislature or governor that failed to certify an election, including your own republican doug ducey. we did not have any court cases where the evidence was presented. we now have evidence that is admissible in a court of law. and i believe that the day will come where we have that court case. we have an a.g., mark brnovich who sat on a mountain of evidence and done nothing, including video evidence. we have the true the vote evidence. we have people who do not want to uncover the truth about our election. and it makes me wonder if they are afraid
democrats grapple with last week s supreme court ruling on abortion. democrats are already facing headwinds in november to keep their slim majority. but the plan, according to house leadership, is to rally voters in november and gain a larger majority. if they can do that, democrats want to pass laws increasing access to abortion. and, change senate rules that have long allowed the minority to block legislation. we know that the senate is broken. you have heard me say multiple times that we need to have get rid of the jim crow filibuster. others are targeting the justices. specifically the justices particularly those who told lawmakers roe was a precedent of the court. do you think lying at a confirmation hearing is an impeachable offense? i believe so. i believe lying under oath is an impeachable offense. also on the wish list, packing the court. i believe we need to get some