violation of even the values i ve heard you talk about time and time again. the ideals that we should have. what is the rush? what are we trying to hide by not having the documents out front? what is with the rush? what are we hiding by not letting those documents come out? sir this committee s a violation of the values that we as a committee have striven for, transparency. we are rushing through this process in a way that is unnecessary. i appeal for the motion to at least be voted on. mr. chairman at least let s have a vote. when we wrote you a letter on august 24 senator asking to have a meeting on this issue, you denied us even the right to meet. here we are, having a meeting. let s at least debate this issue. let s at least call this for a vote. i appeal to your sense of fairness and decency. your commitments you ve made to transparency. this violates what you have even said and called for, sir. you ve called for documents. you yourself, limited documents. we thought
races for years. if you look at the amount of judges that have been put in place since president trump is in office, 90% are white. so they ll be waiting for a long, long time. stephanie ruhle will stay with us. we ll take our first break. when we come back, we ll talk about all things legal and what we re going to be witnessing as soon as those both sides sit down. the cameras are laid down and we ll get under way here in the u.s. senate. u.s. senate. i don t keep track of regrets. and i don t add up the years. but what i do count on is boost®. delicious boost® high protein nuritional drink now has 33% more protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals boost® high protein. be up for life. your hair is so soft!tein. did you use head and shoulders two in one? i did mom. wanna try it? yes. it intensely moisturizes your hair and scalp
i ask that you i ask that you stop so we can conduct this hearing the way we have planned it. maybe it isn t going exactly the way the minority would like to have it go. we have said for a long period of time that we were going to proceed on this very day. and i think we ought to give the american people the opportunity to hear whether judge kavanaugh should be on the supreme court or not. you ve heard my side of the aisle call for regular order. there will be plenty of opportunity [ shouting from protesters ] what did she say? mr. chairman, under regular order, may i ask a point of order, which is that we are now
but they will take offense. i am proud to call myself a radical feminist. tucker: i just want to establish that you are not on the right at all in any way. yet, you have come in because of who are. reading your views on this, the line that struck me, this is more than about bathrooms. what does that mean? this was far beyond bathrooms. when people talk about this is a bathroom bill or a bathroom controversy, it is really not about that for us. in part, it goes to, within the realm of a bathroom, locker room, changing rooms, shower rooms, watch the interpretation of sex to mean gender identity means is that potentially an email who self identifies as female can access any women s bathroom, dormitory, school, it goes even far beyond that, to redefine women and girls to mean a centrally anyone who identifies as a woman or girl for purposes of title ix, which matters to us, because we think women and
looms of resistance to trump it something new and something we haven t seen before. the question i feel like they have to do it because they have a constituency that is up in arms and unable to adjust in any way to the fact that trump was president. they think that they can strangle his presidency in its crib and they are trying to do that. so far, not very effectively. but noisily. as in the case of this lawsuit, i suppose you could argue that they have at least succeeded in selling it to some extent. tucker: i would say, at least maxine waters is suggesting peaceful means. which puts her and a lot of different categories. they have two years until there is any thing they can do electorally about the republican lock on the federal government. does this burn itself out? this rate, this intensity, does it go away? does it escalate? i think that is a $64