sentence. does not say the governor or the supreme court of the state or any court. doesn t say any board of elections or secretary of state. it says lore legislature. it represents the people best of any representative body. the state legislature. people have called this the independent legislature theory, which people? on the left who want their courts run by democrats to make decisions about election in the state, it could not be clear, you would not have a constitution today if the state legislature were not involved in making the decisions about the appointment of electors to choose presidents and vice presidents of the united states. that is number one. i want to take pennsylvania as an example. stick with me. in pennsylvania they have an election law. but they have a very difficult and complicated
democrat governor, in pennsylvania supreme court has 7 members 5 of whom radical left wing democrats voted mostly by teachers union in the state of pennsylvania. very political and in my view corrupt. much likes supreme court in florida in 2000. the problem was by 2020 the election the governor and the court and their surrogates were changing the election laws in pennsylvania from what existed, they were not using the pennsylvania constitution that would sttake too much time. lawyers would come in democrats, try to change the rules, change the laws and the supreme court of pennsylvania did it for them. again much like the supreme court of florida in 2000. lawsuit were brought, including one to supreme court back 2000 rehnquist
have prosecutor who cherry pick and decide this group of individual or this alter nalter alternate or fake list. thehave intents to overturn an election, it could be argued that supreme court of pennsylvania had the incident the intent of overturning the election. it, it worth thinking about. i ll be right back.
article 2 is violated. openly. in sunlight and before our eyes, when the majority democrat elected supreme court of pennsylvania changed the election laws up to a week before the election. when the governor of pennsylvania, and secretary of state of pennsylvania, changed how the election laws were instituted. in violation of this article, even though the republican legislature objected to what they were doing, objected to what they were doing. and so lawsuit were brought. they were brought in court. the supreme court of pennsylvania that violated federal constitution ruled on it. u.s. supreme court refuses to take it up, it appears that 3 justices want to take it up, it takes 4, up like 2000 when al gore was trying to litigate his way to the
pennsylvania, article 2 is violated. openly. when the majority democrat elected supreme court, of pennsylvania, changed the election laws up through a week before the election, the governor of pennsylvania, secretary of state ofnd pennsylvania, changedd how the election laws were instituted. in violation of this article, even though the republican legislature objected to what they were doing, objected to what they were doing. so lawsuit were brought. theyro were brought in court. the supreme court of pennsylvania that violated federal constitution ruled on it u.s. supreme court refused to take it up, it appeared that three justices wanted to take it up, it takes four, up like 2000. when al gore tried to litigate his way to house