Ill be supporting President Trump 100 . Got a country to save. Its not about word or rhetoric, its about saving america. President donald j. Trump is our nominee and will be the 47th president of the United States. Expectation the state of california will make its voice heard on november 5th, Denouncing Donald Trump and his presidency. We have to roll up our sleeves and get the vote out. John we wait to hear the first time on camera since donald trump Big Super Tuesday victories. Lots of questions for the white house, including Will Americans finally see President Biden on a debate stage. Sandra we are also expecting to hear from Mitch Mcconnell any moment now, who just today has endorsed donald trump, as republicans are looking to unify the Party Heading into the general election. John and with that, we kick off our second hour here, im john roberts in washington. Here we go again, sandra. Sandra good to be with you, sandra smith in new york. The latest polling shows biden and trump n
university of north carolina violate the constitution, justice society a may or as says it decades of progress and precedent. president biden weighing in he severely disagrees with the ruling. our coverage begins with fox news legal correspondent and anchor of fox news sunday shannon bream, at the supreme court tonight. hi shannon. hello gillian. in the wake of the decision applicants will still very much be able to share their personal stories in their essays and statements and that can include stories about race and ethnicity and they re alloweded to consider those but they cannot be used as an end run at the heart of today s decision. let us embark on this transformative journey towards a more fair inclusive educational landscape. the supreme court made clear today race can no longer be used as a factor to determine who gets admitted to colleges aname. plaintiffs in the companion cases involving harvard and unc argued that the use of race was working against specific
university of north carolina violate the constitution, justice society a may or as says it decades of progress and precedent. president biden weighing in he severely disagrees with the ruling. our coverage begins with fox news legal correspondent and anchor of fox news sunday shannon bream, at the supreme court tonight. hi shannon. hello gillian. in the wake of the decision applicants will still very much be able to share their personal stories in their essays and statements and that can include stories about race and ethnicity and they re alloweded to consider those but they cannot be used as an end run at the heart of today s decision. let us embark on this transformative journey towards a more fair inclusive educational landscape. the supreme court made clear today race can no longer be used as a factor to determine who gets admitted to colleges aname. plaintiffs in the companion cases involving harvard and unc
realm, has made the guidelines, sentencing guidelines advisory. they used to be mandatory. jurjs used to have to calculate the guidelines for are sentencing purposes and then essentially apply a sentence within the guideline range. in a case called united states verses booker, the supreme court determined that the guidelines were are advisory now. so, they don t have to be applied in every case. you is to calculate them but judges have more freedom to give effect to congress s the various provisions in the statute related to sentencing. in booker, and in the its projany, the supreme court made clear that judges at sentencing i only have a limited amount of time. so, let me just close on one
the guidelines, the sentencing guidelines s advisory. they used to be mandatory. judges used to have to calculate the guidelines for sentencing purposes and then essentially apply a sentence within the guideline range. in a case called united states versus booker, the supreme court determined that the guidelines were are advisory now so they don t have to be applied in every case. you have to calculate them, but judges have more freedom to give effect to congress the various provisions in the statute related to sentencing. in booker and in the in its progeny, the supreme court made clear that judges at sentencing judge, i only have a limited amount of time so let me just