National conversation through cspans Daily Program or through our social media feeds. Cspan created by americas Cable Television companies as a Public Service and brought to you today by your television provider. All persons having business before the Honorable Supreme Court of the United States are admonished to draw near and give their attention. Landmark cases, cspans special history series produced in partnership with the National Constitution center. Exploring the human stories and constitutional dramas behind 12 historic Supreme Court decisions. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court. Quite often in many of our most famous decisions are ones that the court took that were quite unpopular. Lets go through a few cases that illustrate very dramatically and visually what it means to live in a society of different people who help stick together because they believe in a rule of law. Good evening and welcome to cspan landmark cases. Tonights case is katz versus the United States,
If so, call in at 202 7488000. It, 202 7488001. If you supported oppose it, 202 7488002. You can send us a text at 202 7488003. If you send us a text, let us know your name and where you are from. We are on cspan wj at facebook and on twitter. Very good tuesday morning, you can start calling and now as we take you through the categories facing new visa restrictions through the end of the year and perhaps longer as a result of the president s actions yesterday. Actions would impact foreign forers seeking h1 visas skilled hightech workers, h two visas for seasonal workers, age four visas for spouses. L1 are executives transferring from positions abroad with the same employer. And the action would impact visas including interns, trainers, teachers, au summer work travel participants. This includes some exceptions for those in health care or supporting the Coronavirus Response and for those who work in the country upon food service and Food Supply Chain sectors. As julia of the Migration P
Creeping towards the end of its term, we are joined by Elizabeth Wydra from the Constitutional Accountability Center to talk about the Supreme Court key rulings to come. Guest its great to be with you. Public a nonprofit interest law firm which is working to make real the thee progressive promise of the constitution. We focus on the history and values that have overtime made our country a more equal, inclusive, democratic, and free society. We were particularly in the Supreme Court and in congress and with the public to help inform and educate the country about important issues going to the courts today, the importance of the court itself and the meaning of the constitution. Host 14 more cases yet to be handed down, but when it comes by the Supreme Court, but when it comes to the cases and the decisions we have seen the far, has this been a good term for the progressive promise and progressive values at the court . Guest it has been in many important ways. The recent cases have seen wh
Of h. R. 1230, which the clerk will report the title. E clerk a bill to amend the age discrimination act and retaliation claims and for other purposes. The chair when the committee of the whole house rose amendment number 5 printed in house report offered by the gentlewoman from michigan had been disposed of. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule 18, the Unfinished Business is request for recorded vote on amendment number printed in 1116790 on which further proceedings were postponed and the knows prevailed by voice vote. The clerk will redesignate the amendment. The clerk amendment number 3 offered by mr. Allen of georgia. The chair a recorded vote has been requested. Those in support of a recorded vote will rise and be counted. A sufficient number having arisen, a recorded vote is ordered. Members will record their votes by electronic device. This will be a 15minute vote. [captioning made possible by the national captioning institute, inc. , in cooperation with the United States house of repr
The Heritage Foundation hosted this event where panelists debated the pros and cons of existing laws. Good afternoon. My name is david azerrad, director of the simon center principles and politics and the Family Foundation fellow here at the Heritage Foundation. Its my pleasure to welcome you to the Heritage Foundation for this panel discussion. The freedom of the press as all americans know is enshrined in the First Amendment. A free press is a necessary component of republican selfgovernment and a hallmark of a free society. That is not in question. In fact, its a nonnegotiable. Free speech, however, is not the exclusive prerogative of the press. The First Amendment you will remember protects the freespeech rights of all americans, not just those who so happen to have an in a in journalism. The prez, in other words, is itself subject to free speech just like everyone else is. Journalists do not take well to criticism and i say this as recovering journalist myself. There is a tendency