Next, officials testifying on the use of biometrics and its impact on privacy they are asked about the use of facial Recognition Technology and privacy risks. The hearing before house subcommittee on investigations and oversight is just under an hour and a half today our focus will be on how Technological Solutions can secure our privacy while allowing us to enjoy the benefits of biometric tools. Biometric privacy enhancing technologies can and should be implemented, along with Biometric Technologies, so called beach pads, the socalled beat pads could be implemented at the point of capture, improving the precision of collection tools to ensure they are not picking up features that are not necessary for use. They can insert, for example, obfuscations on the data collected, degrading the quality of the information, or introducing statistical noise so the biometric data is less usable for unintended uses. The technique called a template protection can ensure that one systems biometric inf
You get to hear about Upcoming Supreme Court term and hear from some of the top experts we could line up. The order in which our three panelists will speak varies slightly from the program you might have seen and it is reverse alphabetical order. Will introduce the three of them all at once and take a seat. You might even hear from eat later on. From me later on. Elia will always be the one who got away. He is now the director of constitutional studies and a senior fellow. However, probably all of you know him for many years to be spent at Cato Institute culminating in being director of catos center for constitutional studies. He was publisher and published 11 volumes. He has testified oh ok. You are responsible one way or another for 11 volumes. How many briefs have any of you filed . I bet it has not been more than 500. That is the extraordinary accomplishment and distinction he has here. He is associated with many other Nonprofit Institutions and is the author of supreme disorder ju
You get to hear about Upcoming Supreme Court term and hear from some of the top experts we could line up. The order in which our three panelists will speak varies slightly from the program you might have seen and it is reverse alphabetical order. Will introduce the three of them all at once and take a seat. You might even hear from eat later on. From me later on. Elia will always be the one who got away. He is now the director of constitutional studies and a senior fellow. However, probably all of you know him for many years to be spent at Cato Institute culminating in being director of catos center for constitutional studies. He was publisher and published 11 volumes. He has testified oh ok. You are responsible one way or another for 11 volumes. How many briefs have any of you filed . I bet it has not been more than 500. That is the extraordinary accomplishment and distinction he has here. He is associated with many other Nonprofit Institutions and is the author of supreme disorder ju
A liberal direction and i think there are ways in which what we saw is the kind of mirror image of that opening up new conservatives again just putting labels on the things and pushing it in a more conservative direction so there is a sort of prioryear examples of the ways in which this dynamic occurred before and what is interesting to me is the way that the dynamics are different even though there are some similarities. One aspect mentioned is the kind element so looking back at the 1960s they would write an article and then it would come out a year later and thered be the case three or four years later and the internet just kind of changes all of that. One change that is worth reflecting on that was stunning years ago is the fact haughty even get opinions quickly. At that time there was mostly waiting for the opinions from the library. It could take a couple days or weeks or months to come out with the opinion if he wanted to know what the court had held and today it is frustrating.
Liberty a minute. Repo book and join the conversation, go to booktv. Org and click on book club to enter the chat room. Next on booktv from the Heritage Foundation in washington, d. C. , a discussion on the legal arguments against the Affordable Care act. Trevor burrus, editor of the book and a panel, all law professors and bloggers for the volokh conspiracy website, talk about the impact of the arguments on the obama to debate, both in public and in the courts. This is about an hour 15. Thank you much for being here, and i applaud you hardy souls who braved the cold weather today in order to be here. We are here today with several distinct which panelists to talk about a fascinating book. It was a fascinating about a fascinating case of National Federation of independent business is versus sebelius, better known as the obamacare case. And as i read this book, i thought that i was really watching some very, very smart people who obviously respect each other but who are in no way, shape