"Although Sec106 is not aimed at relieving the prosecution from its burden to establish guilt of an accused, it applies to cases where chain of events has been successfully established by the prosecution", the Court said
The Supreme Court held that by recalling the vacancy of FPS, the State government was trying to enforce the 2013 Act, which included in its ambit, a responsibility to reform the existing Targeted Distribution System.
The Supreme Court held that even if a plea of adverse possession is taken by the possession holder, the same must be examined keeping in view the case set up by the plaintiff.