a final decision. and never make sub public, or rarely makes a public disclosure of what it has done. there is a boneless quality to the ethics code over there. you really can t have real ethics without real procedure. what these letter, both of them, back to us confirm, is that the supreme court has absolutely no procedure to enforce the ethics code, and with no procedure to enforce the ethics code, it is nothing more than a wall decoration. congressman johnson, given the quartz lack of cooperation thus far, what are the next steps to be taken from here? well, thank you for having me, it is a joy to be with my friend, and my colleague, senator whitehouse working on these issues. a court other supreme court in particular, has enjoyed being able to operate in complete
with you on this, do you think it will make that much of a difference with the midterms still pretty far away? it s not going to change the balance of the court. the court is still moving in a conservative direction with a 6-3 ideology. what will change is republicans had traditionally motivated voters on confirming justices, supreme court in particular has been a big motivating factor for republican politicians and voters. democrats have not been able to motivate voters in the same way. showing the makeup of the court reflects the american public i think can be a political factor. i worked on merrick garland s nonconfirmation campaign and that was a true politicization of supreme court confirmations. everything became in an election year. very interesting. kevin, i have 30 seconds. any last words from you? i think one of the things that justice breyer will leave behind is a legacy not only of