litigation and my being asked by lawyers in pennsylvania case. i walk you in the book through president trump asking me when the texas case of the supreme court if the supreme court took the texas case if i would argue that, i told president trump i would be happy to, i walked them through that day on january 6. where in the days beforehand i worked to assemble a coalition of 11 senators to stand up and object and demand an election commission to examine the est o evidence of voter fraud, and trying to keep that coalition together, standing up and objecting and walk through the riot that happened, work to keep senators together, some were getting wobbly, and i walked them through the narrative to understand what happened, if you are at home talking to people about january 6, lifleft used wildly politicize term like insurrection, that is political garbage.
delay, delay, and i hadthink th the norm. i think he will probably fight it with the magistrate judge, then take it to the district court, get the district judge to side with him, fail there, go to the court of appeals, take it to the supreme court if the supreme court i can t believe they would take this case. i mean, this is not this is not this is a clear cut issue, if you will, on suppression of a subpoena or, excuse me, a warrant for a search and seizure. this is not a big case. but it is a big deal. we will see. thanks, john dean. yes, we will. thank you. nuclear documents and other classified materials. that s what the washington post is saying the fbi was searching for. i am going to talk to an intelligence expert about all of that next.
focus on this problem. you know, in any event, john, 3:00 tomorrow, is frankly, just around the corner in the grand scheme of things. i do wonder when they will decide to do. do you think they re going to, if your trump s team, do you think they re going to try and keep this quiet? in the sense of not public? well, his standard operating procedure as was mentioned in the last segment, is delay, delay, delay. i think that s the norm. i think he will probably try to fight it. fight with the magistrate judge. then take it to the district court, get the district court judge decide with him, fail there. go to the court of appeals, taken to the supreme court if the supreme court. i can t believe i take this case. i mean, this is a pretty clear cut issue, if you will. on suppression of a subpoena, excuse me, a warrant for a
how far reaching is this? happened in michigan but could it happen elsewhere and could this decision impact the country? it could impact the country if the plaintiff whose case is dismissed and gone, appealed to the supreme court if the supreme court takes the case and affirms the sixth circumstance circuit. then it would be aapplicable to the country. thisç decision would by highly persuasive and i think probably followed in most circumstances by most of the other circuits because it make goods sense. if an officer has a warrant, there s a situation that could be dangerous, there s in this case put bulls pit bulls, one of whom an officer testified in an unrebet butted way, republicked at them. i never like to categorize the dogs but in this sense the police felt threatened. thank you very much. we ll be right back.
any property of a taxpayer by reason of any failure to pay the penalty imposed by this section, or levery any such property with respect to such failure. we will find out soon, possibly as early as tomorrow, if the supreme court decides to uphold the individual mandate in the affordable care act. justice ruth bader ginsburg highlighted the key question facing the supreme court if the supreme court finds the mandate unconstitutional. if the individual mandate requiring the purchase of insurance or the payment of a penalty, if that is unconstitutional, must the entire act fall? or may the mandate be chopped, like a head of broccoli, from the rest of the act. joining me now is lawrence jacobs, a professor at the university of minnesota and co-author of the book health care reform and american politics. professor jacobs, you had an