[indiscernible] good morning. Before you get started can just get a couple of things on the record. Our jurisdiction was challenged by an amica. I do want to speak to you more about jurisdiction, because we still have to say we have the jurisdiction. So even though you believe there is jurisdiction with respect to the collateral order doctrine, how do you place that in line with the asphalt case which specifically says in a criminal case, your jurisdiction needs to stem from the the explicit as well in statutory law . We have three responses. If you look at the language that Justice Scalia discussed, a situation where the right is anl value would be destroyed and these claims of absolute imni within that discrimination explicitly stating that and dont have communication with anything in the statute. I disagree. The doctrine arisees from ti 1. It is reenforced by the impeachment judgment clause which refers to wallace facility is talking about a situation where the right not to be tried