the state of california of california is not allowed to actively subvert federal law. it is not acting in concert with the other 49 states. that is an act of insurrection. am i missing something? the constitution does provide basic rights. it allows the states to create more rights for the residence. tucker: no, i know you say you are a lawyer but i m not saying we will detain you coming to port you, if you are working hard, you can stay here. i caner still operate. tucker: now you are getting into what we want to be true. i m just saying what is true. here is what is true as of now. the constitution has been interpreted by the supreme court foror more than 200 years to say that states cannot act against federal law. that is one of the oldest precepts in american law. if you say you are a lawyer, i m sure you know that. the point i m making is this. these people here illegally, congress can change that, they can legalize them. right now,t. their presence is n
violation of federal law.e the mayor of an american cities is saying that you may not participate with a lot federal law enforcement. you have to oppose federal law. that is not workable. that is an act of insurrection against the federal government. do you care? just because it is federal law doesn t mean it is right, doesn t mean it s constitutional. the supreme court has ruled, and federal courts have ruled that the president does not have the authority to use racialist termination to target immigrants. it is unconstitutionalr for the president to target sanctuary cities tucker: i m sorry, i can t let you targeting immigrants. tucker: i don t want to check your bar license the federal government has a right to enforce federal law. federal immigration law has not been overturned by the supreme court. don t make up facts on the show. those laws are enforced. the federal government, by