out of mar-a-lago, i think, would have to be enormous. what you re hearing from people who support donald trump at the moment is, january 6th, blah, didn t even really listen to it. all of this is just one more investigation. i think it gets kind of lost in a jumble of investigations that they don t really care about because that is all of the deep state trying to get their guy. it seems to me, politically, in november, michael, the stuff that is almost more important is what joe was talking about. it s this ginning up of violence against fbi agents. it s the extremism perhaps of roe v. wade. it s that that is moving people politically. because they re not really tuning into the nitty-gritty the january 6th hearings have been masterful as a class in narrative building, but i m not sure how much they re tuning into that or the details of investigations and the mar-a-lago stuff. if it is not super explosive, what the fbi has found, it will just be seen as government
and get to and stay undetectable can no longer transmit h-i-v through sex. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a buildup of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding, or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your doctor. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache. if you re living with hiv, keep loving who you are. and ask your doctor if biktarvy is right for you. this is the moment. for a brand new treatment for moderate-to-severe eczema. cibinqo - now fda approved 100% steroid free not an injection, cibinqo is a once-daily pill for adults who didn t respond to previous treatments. and cibinqo provides clearer skin and helps relieve itch.
into their life histories. it s a statistical likelihood, but at least one of them has personally in some sense participated in an abortion, possibly by paying for it. we, as is very common and the idea that they actually really believed this stuff that they were saying on the campaign trail, and really wanted it to happen, is something i have never accepted about any one of them ever. but the people they put on the supreme court didn t get the memo, let that stuff is just campaign talk. it s interesting to see the right, to see the antiabortion right, and see the republicans certainly pleased with what happens today. but also, worried about the electoral consequences of this, because they re the dock to cut the car here, in a way. it s one thing to chris say about the horrors of abortion, and why we need to get rid of it, and how terrible it is, and
participated in an abortion, possibly by paying for it. as is very common. and the idea that they actually really believed this stuff that they were saying on the campaign trail, and really wanted it to happen, is something i have never accepted about any one of them ever. but the people they put on the supreme court didn t get the memo, that stuff is just campaign talk. it s interesting to see the right, to see the antiabortion right, and see the republicans certainly pleased with what happens today. but also, worried about the electoral consequences of this, because they re the dog that cut the car here, in a way. it s one thing to talk about the horrors of abortion, and why we need to get rid of it, and how terrible it is, and we will get rid of it. then, if you do get rid of it, and if you re the person responsible for america being a country without right that is no longer available to all american women.
history, i get everything you learned at a levels and university about british history was wrong, and that britain was a gun toting paradise where anyone could carry a gun peacefully in public, which i think does not make a lot of sense to anyone who has lived in the uk or has any understanding of its history. we pointed out that the law new york had on the books was not only a century old but itself derived from laws on the books for decades before the 20th century. when the decision finally came out, it was no surprise to me and others, the supreme court didn t actually reconstruct the history, they kind of invented their own alternative history. as one of the justice pointed out, either every example of gun regulation was too short, too long ago, too recent, and it basically seems like there is no kind of gun regulation that the supreme court is willing to accept as historically grounded, despite